Scope repositories
Nominate repos, branches and evidence categories so scans stay bounded to the systems under review.
For security and engineering teams
Acompli helps security and engineering teams support privacy work with concrete technical evidence from systems, repositories and reviewed Code Scan findings instead of repeated questionnaires.
Evidence lens
The security and engineering page now shows how code, system and control evidence supports DPIAs, RoPA and privacy risks through human review gates.

Code Scan for technical teams
Acompli's Code Scan is not a vulnerability scanner, SAST replacement or SBOM generator. It answers a different engineering question: what technical evidence in the codebase supports privacy, AI governance, data mapping and risk review?
Nominate repos, branches and evidence categories so scans stay bounded to the systems under review.
Find privacy and AI-governance signals across source, dependencies, schemas, config and infrastructure-as-code.
Each finding carries file, line, branch and commit context so engineering can confirm, reject or annotate it.
Approved findings become evidence for DPIAs, RoPA, data maps, supplier records and AI governance follow-up. Acompli links each promoted finding to the record it now evidences.
Engineering handoff
Findings stay technical enough for engineers to verify and structured enough for privacy teams to attach to Article 30, Article 35, transfer, vendor and AI-governance work. Acompli records each confirmation, rejection or annotation with the reviewer and commit context, so a finding keeps its provenance after handoff.
Explore Code ScanTechnical evidence
Acompli keeps system, vendor, data-flow and code evidence connected to the assessments and records that depend on it.
Acompli's Code Scan can surface reviewable findings from repositories while privacy teams keep the approval and governance workflow intact.
Security and engineering teams can keep SAST, SBOM and vulnerability tooling where it belongs, while Code Scan supplies the file, line, branch and commit provenance privacy records need.
Benefits
Reuse approved system and supplier context across assessments.
Connect source-code findings to files, systems, data fields and AI signals.
Use technical facts to support Article 30 records and assessment answers.
Assign owners, mitigations and review dates for technical risk work.
Acompli overlap
Use source-code evidence to support data mapping, DPIAs, RoPA and AI governance.
Open moduleBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, data categories and transfers.
Open moduleExtract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleDocument AI systems, assessments, classification decisions and evidence alongside GDPR records.
Open moduleSee how code, systems and security findings support privacy records with review gates and audit history.