Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Proteus-Cyber is profiled first using its public positioning: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Proteus-Cyber alternativeRoPADPIADSAREvidence
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
On this page
Key takeaways
- Proteus-Cyber public market lane: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training.
- Proteus-Cyber best-fit buyer: Enterprise and mid-market organisations - especially UK and multinational - that want a single configurable platform covering the full privacy suite (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning, training) across multiple global privacy laws.
- Proteus-Cyber published strengths include consent management and cookie scanning as built-in modules - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- The capability rows are evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, and "N" means not clearly evidenced here.
Comparison workflow
From company profile to shortlist decision
01Proteus-Cyber profileWhat Proteus-Cyber provides02Official website signalsWhat Proteus-Cyber emphasises on its own website03Published strengthsProteus-Cyber products, services and stated strengths04Comparison contextProteus-Cyber alternatives05At a glanceProteus-Cyber vs Acompli at a glance06Capability comparisonProteus-Cyber product and service coverage compared with Acompli07Ireland & UKProteus-Cyber vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Market lanechecked
Best-fit buyerchecked
Public strengthschecked
Capability evidencechecked
Overlapchecked
Gapschecked
Exportschecked
Shortlist fitchecked
01Proteus-Cyber profile
What Proteus-Cyber provides
Proteus-Cyber Ltd (20-22 Wenlock Road, London) is a UK legal-tech vendor whose flagship product, Proteus NextGen Data Privacy, gives DPOs, privacy teams and legal teams a broad, highly configurable platform to run a GDPR, CCPA, LGPD or PDPA compliance programme. It spans automated PIA/DPIA/TIA surveys, data mapping and discovery, RoPA reporting, DSAR handling, automated and legislation-based risk assessment, vendor risk management, breach notification, consent management, cookie scanning, privacy-by-design, policy templates, security-awareness training and automated Schrems II SCC generation.
Pricing signal reviewed on 1 July 2026: Proteus publishes an Express plan at GBP 11,995 per year (single user, single site, with a 14-day free trial) for smaller organisations wanting quick site-wide regulatory audits with reporting; a stand-alone Schrems II version to audit vendors and automate SCC contracts; and an Enterprise version priced on application (POA), with unlimited users and sites and the full feature set. All versions are cloud SaaS, hosted in the EU with regional controls, and are 'upward' upgradable. Buyers should verify current scope, plan limits, module availability and contract terms directly with Proteus-Cyber.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training. |
| Best-fit buyer | Enterprise and mid-market organisations - especially UK and multinational - that want a single configurable platform covering the full privacy suite (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning, training) across multiple global privacy laws. |
| Review / pricing signal | London (UK) vendor; cloud SaaS hosted in the EU with regional controls. Public pricing includes an Express plan at GBP 11,995/year with a 14-day free trial; a stand-alone Schrems II version; and Enterprise on application (POA). Third-party review coverage is thin - a Softonic editorial review rates it 8/10 and flags price as the main drawback for smaller organisations; G2 and Capterra listings carry few user reviews. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS platform hosted in the EU with regional controls implemented; three upward-upgradable versions (Schrems II, Express, Enterprise) covering assessments, data mapping/discovery, RoPA, DSAR, risk, vendor risk, breach, consent, cookie scanning, policy templates and training. |
02Official website signals
What Proteus-Cyber emphasises on its own website
Proteus-Cyber positions Proteus NextGen Data Privacy as enterprise data privacy management software for global privacy compliance. Official source reviewed on 30 June 2026.
- Official product pages emphasise PIA/DPIA and TIA assessments, DSAR management, privacy by design, risk assessment, third-party audits, breach notification and data discovery.
- The public lane is broad privacy-programme management across multiple global privacy standards.
- Proteus-Cyber is best treated as a broad privacy-management suite rather than a narrow Article 30 workflow.
03Published strengths
Proteus-Cyber products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Proteus-Cyber is an established, broad and highly configurable privacy suite, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- Consent management and cookie scanning as built-in modules - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- Breach and incident management with a 72-hour countdown timer and regulator-specific output formats (ICO, CNIL, CCPA) - Acompli does not package a breach-notification module.
- Security-awareness training built into the platform, with staff-training reporting and gap identification - Acompli has no training module.
- Published Express pricing (GBP 11,995/year with a 14-day free trial) and automated Schrems II SCC generation - Acompli prices on scope and does not list public prices.
04Comparison context
Proteus-Cyber alternatives
Proteus-Cyber is publicly positioned in this market lane: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training.
This page profiles Proteus-Cyber's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, review and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
The comparison is evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, while "N" means not clearly evidenced here rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
05At a glance
Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli at a glance
Published by Acompli and last reviewed on 30 June 2026. This page profiles Proteus-Cyber first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Proteus-Cyber | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want a broad, highly configurable privacy suite with consent, cookie scanning, breach, vendor risk and training across global privacy laws. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | A broad, configurable privacy-operations platform spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning and training. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
06Capability comparison
Proteus-Cyber product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in public sources reviewed for this comparison.
| Capability | Proteus-Cyber | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | Y |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | N | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | Y | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | Y | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | Y | N |
07Ireland & UK
Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Proteus-Cyber is built for global, multi-standard privacy programmes and outputs RoPA reports and controller/processor records across GDPR, CCPA, LGPD and PDPA, while Acompli is built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth and defensibility of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Proteus-Cyber and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
08Shortlisting notes
When Proteus-Cyber belongs on the shortlist
Proteus-Cyber should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Proteus-Cyber questions answered
What is Proteus-Cyber?
Proteus-Cyber is profiled here in this market lane: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training. Proteus-Cyber Ltd (20-22 Wenlock Road, London) is a UK legal-tech vendor whose flagship product, Proteus NextGen Data Privacy, gives DPOs, privacy teams and legal teams a broad, highly configurable platform to run a GDPR, CCPA, LGPD or PDPA compliance programme. It spans automated PIA/DPIA/TIA surveys, data mapping and discovery, RoPA reporting, DSAR handling, automated and legislation-based risk assessment, vendor risk management, breach notification, consent management, cookie scanning, privacy-by-design, policy templates, security-awareness training and automated Schrems II SCC generation.
What does Proteus-Cyber provide?
Proteus-Cyber provides the products, services or modules publicly evidenced in the capability table on this page. The table covers RoPA, DPIA/PIA assessments, DSAR/privacy rights, data mapping, vendor risk, privacy risk, AI governance, consent, cookie scanning, breach, retention, policy, training, workflow, audit and export signals.
Who is Proteus-Cyber best suited for?
Proteus-Cyber is best suited for enterprise and mid-market organisations - especially UK and multinational - that want a single configurable platform covering the full privacy suite (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning, training) across multiple global privacy laws. Buyers should still verify current product scope, service scope, contract terms and implementation requirements directly with Proteus-Cyber.
What are Proteus-Cyber's main product or service strengths?
Proteus-Cyber's published strengths include Consent management and cookie scanning as built-in modules - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers; Breach and incident management with a 72-hour countdown timer and regulator-specific output formats (ICO, CNIL, CCPA) - Acompli does not package a breach-notification module; Security-awareness training built into the platform, with staff-training reporting and gap identification - Acompli has no training module.
What is Proteus-Cyber's pricing or review signal?
Proteus-Cyber's pricing or review signal in this profile is: Pricing signal reviewed on 1 July 2026: Proteus publishes an Express plan at GBP 11,995 per year (single user, single site, with a 14-day free trial) for smaller organisations wanting quick site-wide regulatory audits with reporting; a stand-alone Schrems II version to audit vendors and automate SCC contracts; and an Enterprise version priced on application (POA), with unlimited users and sites and the full feature set. All versions are cloud SaaS, hosted in the EU with regional controls, and are 'upward' upgradable. Buyers should verify current scope, plan limits, module availability and contract terms directly with Proteus-Cyber. This page was last reviewed on 30 June 2026, and buyers should verify current pricing, ratings, plan limits, implementation fees and service scope directly with Proteus-Cyber.
Does Proteus-Cyber support GDPR Article 30 RoPA?
Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for RoPA / Article 30 in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Proteus-Cyber support DPIA or privacy assessments?
Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for DPIA/PIA assessments in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Proteus-Cyber support DSAR or privacy rights workflows?
Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for DSAR / privacy rights in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Proteus-Cyber provide data mapping?
Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for Data mapping in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Proteus-Cyber provide vendor risk or third-party privacy risk management?
Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for Vendor risk in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Proteus-Cyber provide consent management or cookie scanning?
Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for Consent management in the reviewed source set. Yes. Proteus-Cyber is marked as publicly evidenced for Cookie/tracker scanning in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as not clearly evidenced for consent management and not clearly evidenced for cookie/tracker scanning, so buyers needing either capability should verify live vendor scope before procurement.
Does Proteus-Cyber provide AI governance?
Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Proteus-Cyber is marked N for AI governance here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
How should buyers read the Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli capability table?
The table records public evidence found for each supplier. "Y" means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in reviewed public sources; "N" means it was not clearly evidenced here, not proof that the supplier cannot provide it.
What are Proteus-Cyber alternatives?
Proteus-Cyber alternatives depend on the buyer's exact requirement, because Proteus-Cyber's strongest fit is: Choose Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run. The shortlist may include broad privacy platforms, GRC tools, specialist consent or DSAR tools, service providers, and Acompli where the buyer needs overlapping privacy-governance workflows shown in the table.
How does Proteus-Cyber compare with Acompli?
Proteus-Cyber should be assessed first on its own published fit: Choose Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run. Acompli is included as a factual overlap point where the requirement is: Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. Buyers should ask both suppliers to demonstrate the same workflow with current product screens, exports and implementation assumptions.
When should buyers shortlist Proteus-Cyber?
Buyers should shortlist Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run. They should only compare Acompli for the overlapping requirements shown on this page, and they should keep any specialist supplier that covers a requirement neither platform clearly evidences.
How current is this Proteus-Cyber profile?
This profile was last reviewed on 30 June 2026. Ratings, pricing, product names, plan limits and service scope can change, so buyers should treat this as a comparison guide and verify current details with Proteus-Cyber before procurement.
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Proteus-Cyber alternative
Who are Proteus-Cyber's competitors?
Proteus-Cyber's Proteus NextGen Data Privacy competes with broad privacy-operations platforms such as OneTrust, TrustArc and DataGrail, and it positions directly against OneTrust as a more configurable, better-value alternative. Acompli competes as a focused, privacy-native alternative for Ireland, UK and EU teams that want connected, evidence-traceable RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendor and AI-governance records with human approval, rather than a broad global suite.
Is Acompli a good Proteus-Cyber alternative?
Acompli is a strong Proteus-Cyber alternative when the priority is a defensible, assessment-fed record rather than breadth of modules. RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records are connected, confidence-scored, human-approved and exportable for the DPC or ICO. Proteus-Cyber remains the better fit if you specifically need consent management, cookie scanning, a packaged breach module, security-awareness training or automated Schrems II SCC generation.
Does Acompli replace Proteus-Cyber?
Acompli can replace Proteus-Cyber for the core privacy-operations workflows - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, privacy risk, vendor records, data mapping and EU AI Act governance - for many teams. It does not replace Proteus-Cyber's consent management, cookie scanning, breach module or security-awareness training; teams that rely on those keep them alongside Acompli or use a dedicated tool.
How do Proteus-Cyber and Acompli differ?
Proteus-Cyber is a broad, highly configurable privacy suite - assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning and training across GDPR, CCPA, LGPD and PDPA, hosted as cloud SaaS in the EU with published Express pricing. Acompli is narrower and deeper on governed records: assessment-fed Article 30 records, data mapping, AI-Act governance and code-scan evidence, each traceable to its source and human-approved, built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO.
Does Proteus-Cyber publish pricing, and does Acompli?
Proteus-Cyber publishes an Express plan at GBP 11,995 per year (single user, single site) with a 14-day free trial, a stand-alone Schrems II version, and an Enterprise version priced on application (POA). Acompli prices on scope (legal entities, jurisdictions, users and integrations) and provides pricing on request rather than a public list price, because the effort scales with the programme rather than the number of logins.
What is the best Proteus-Cyber alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams?
The best Proteus-Cyber alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams is one built around GDPR Article 30 coverage, DPC and ICO fit, and a self-contained per-entity export. Acompli is built around exactly those - both Article 30(1) and 30(2) records, EU and UK GDPR distinguished on one register, and an export the DPC or ICO can read without a platform login - the provenance wedge a broad global suite does not foreground.
Does Proteus-Cyber have an EU AI Act or AI governance module?
Proteus NextGen Data Privacy focuses on data-privacy compliance across GDPR, CCPA, LGPD and PDPA; its public materials centre on assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training rather than a dedicated EU AI Act or AI-system register module, so AI governance is not evidenced. Acompli's AI governance module supports EU AI Act risk classification, assessment-driven AI-system records and human approval of each AI system entry, with the record traceable to its evidence source - a defined difference for teams whose deciding factor is AI-Act readiness.
Does Proteus-Cyber handle Schrems II and international transfers?
Yes - Proteus-Cyber offers a stand-alone Schrems II version and automated Standard Contractual Clause (SCC) generation to audit vendors and produce transfer contracts, and it includes Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) templates. Acompli supports transfer assessments as part of its connected assessment set, with each transfer decision traceable back to the approved evidence and record; teams whose deciding factor is automated SCC contract generation at scale may prefer Proteus-Cyber's dedicated Schrems II tooling.
Does Proteus-Cyber offer consent management and cookie scanning?
Yes - Proteus-Cyber includes a configurable consent-management module (consent by process, marketing, special-category and third-party consent) and a cookie scanning module for website cookie compliance and consent. Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers; teams that need a consent and cookie layer would keep Proteus-Cyber or a dedicated CMP alongside Acompli's governed records.
Is Proteus-Cyber suitable for multi-entity corporate groups?
Proteus-Cyber's Enterprise version supports unlimited users and sites and multi-standard coverage (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD and others) on one instance, so it does serve larger corporate groups. Acompli models multi-entity structures with a self-contained per-entity export for each supervisory authority, so each subsidiary can answer its own DPC or ICO. For groups whose deciding factor is a defensible, per-entity Article 30 record traceable back to source evidence, Acompli may be the closer structural fit.
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleDSAR management
Manage requests from intake to archive with deadlines, identity checks, redaction and audit history.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Proteus-Cyber and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Proteus-Cyber, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.