Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Proteus-Cyber is profiled first using its public positioning: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Proteus-Cyber alternativeRoPADPIAEvidence
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
On this page
Key takeaways
- Proteus-Cyber public market lane: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training.
- Proteus-Cyber best-fit buyer: Enterprise and mid-market organisations - especially UK and multinational - that want a single configurable platform covering the full privacy suite (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning, training) across multiple global privacy laws.
- Proteus-Cyber published strengths include consent management and cookie scanning as built-in modules - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Proteus-Cyber profile
What Proteus-Cyber provides
Proteus-Cyber Ltd (20-22 Wenlock Road, London) is a UK legal-tech vendor whose flagship product, Proteus NextGen Data Privacy, gives DPOs, privacy teams and legal teams a broad, highly configurable platform to run a GDPR, CCPA, LGPD or PDPA compliance programme. It spans automated PIA/DPIA/TIA surveys, data mapping and discovery, RoPA reporting, DSAR handling, automated and legislation-based risk assessment, vendor risk management, breach notification, consent management, cookie scanning, privacy-by-design, policy templates, security-awareness training and automated Schrems II SCC generation.
Proteus publishes an Express plan at GBP 11,995 per year (single user, single site, with a 14-day free trial) for smaller organisations wanting quick site-wide regulatory audits with reporting; a stand-alone Schrems II version to audit vendors and automate SCC contracts; and an Enterprise version priced on application (POA), with unlimited users and sites and the full feature set. All versions are cloud SaaS, hosted in the EU with regional controls, and are 'upward' upgradable.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training. |
| Best-fit buyer | Enterprise and mid-market organisations - especially UK and multinational - that want a single configurable platform covering the full privacy suite (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning, training) across multiple global privacy laws. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | London (UK) vendor; cloud SaaS hosted in the EU with regional controls. Public pricing includes an Express plan at GBP 11,995/year with a 14-day free trial; a stand-alone Schrems II version; and Enterprise on application (POA). Third-party review coverage is thin - a Softonic editorial review rates it 8/10 and flags price as the main drawback for smaller organisations; G2 and Capterra listings carry few user reviews. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS platform hosted in the EU with regional controls implemented; three upward-upgradable versions (Schrems II, Express, Enterprise) covering assessments, data mapping/discovery, RoPA, DSAR, risk, vendor risk, breach, consent, cookie scanning, policy templates and training. |
02Official website signals
What Proteus-Cyber emphasises on its own website
Proteus-Cyber positions Proteus NextGen Data Privacy as enterprise data privacy management software for global privacy compliance.
- Official product pages emphasise PIA/DPIA and TIA assessments, DSAR management, privacy by design, risk assessment, third-party audits, breach notification and data discovery.
- The public lane is broad privacy-programme management across multiple global privacy standards.
- Proteus-Cyber is best treated as a broad privacy-management suite rather than a narrow Article 30 workflow.
03Published strengths
Proteus-Cyber products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Proteus-Cyber is an established, broad and highly configurable privacy suite, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- Consent management and cookie scanning as built-in modules - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- Breach and incident management with a 72-hour countdown timer and regulator-specific output formats (ICO, CNIL, CCPA) - Acompli does not package a breach-notification module.
- Security-awareness training built into the platform, with staff-training reporting and gap identification - Acompli has no training module.
- Published Express pricing (GBP 11,995/year with a 14-day free trial) and automated Schrems II SCC generation - Acompli prices on scope and does not list public prices.
04Sourced 2025-2026 signals
What's new at Proteus-Cyber (2025-2026, sourced)
These sourced updates were researched on 2026-07-05 and are listed separately from the live comparison table so existing profile claims remain unchanged.
Proteus-Cyber has an independent review signal from independent analyst platform SoftwareReviews (Info-Tech Research Group), which has named Proteus NextGen Data Privacy a 'Data Quadrant Champion' for four consecutive years (2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 — its most recent award, with 11 Top Rated Capabilities and 9 Top Rated Features), and an 'Emotional Footprint Champion' for 2022-2024, based on 35 user reviews with an 8.0/10 composite score, 94% likeliness-to-recommend, 99% plan-to-renew, and 82% satisfaction of cost relative to value. This is a more substantial independent review signal than the existing profile's framing of 'thin' third-party coverage suggests (G2 and Capterra specifically remain thin — 0 and 1 review respectively — but SoftwareReviews/Info-Tech carries an analyst-report-level review base the existing text does not mention).
Proteus-Cyber's current site organizes the platform into a distinct 'NextGen Proactive Protection' solution offering Continuous Control Monitoring (CCM): linking implemented privacy/security controls to existing security technology via API, periodically re-testing those controls, and alerting on control failure so lapses are caught before they cause a breach. This breach-prevention/control-testing capability (also listed as an Enterprise-tier feature alongside 'CMDB threat intelligence integration,' 'Website integrity monitor,' and 'Automatic regulatory exposure mapping' on the product-versions page) is not evidenced or mentioned in the existing repo profile or capability table.
Proteus-Cyber's current site (verified live, footer copyright '2026 Proteus-Cyber Ltd') now markets the platform as eight distinct 'NextGen' solution modules — Privacy, Data Discovery, Vendor Management, Consent, DSAR, Privacy Automation, Proactive Protection, and Privacy Research — each with its own page, rather than presenting purely as one bundled suite. This is a modular go-to-market framing the existing profile (written as one monolithic 'Proteus NextGen Data Privacy' suite) does not reflect.
05Comparison context
Proteus-Cyber alternatives
Proteus-Cyber is publicly positioned in this market lane: Broad, highly configurable privacy-operations platform for global compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PDPA) spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookies and training.
This page profiles Proteus-Cyber's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
06At a glance
Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Proteus-Cyber first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Proteus-Cyber | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want a broad, highly configurable privacy suite with consent, cookie scanning, breach, vendor risk and training across global privacy laws. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | A broad, configurable privacy-operations platform spanning assessments, DSAR, breach, vendor risk, consent, cookie scanning and training. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
07Capability comparison
Proteus-Cyber product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Proteus-Cyber | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | N | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | Y | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | Y | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | Y | N |
08Ireland & UK
Proteus-Cyber vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Proteus-Cyber is built for global, multi-standard privacy programmes and outputs RoPA reports and controller/processor records across GDPR, CCPA, LGPD and PDPA, while Acompli is built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth and defensibility of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Proteus-Cyber and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
09Shortlisting notes
When Proteus-Cyber belongs on the shortlist
Proteus-Cyber should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Proteus-Cyber when configurable breadth, consent and cookie scanning, breach handling, training and multi-standard global coverage match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Proteus-Cyber questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Proteus-Cyber alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Proteus-Cyber and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Proteus-Cyber, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.