Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Ketch vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Ketch is profiled first using its public positioning: Enterprise data privacy, consent/CMP, DSR, data mapping, AI, assessments and privacy orchestration. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
Key takeaways
- Ketch public market lane: Enterprise data privacy, consent/CMP, DSR, data mapping, AI, assessments and privacy orchestration.
- Ketch best-fit buyer: Enterprise and mid-market privacy and marketing teams needing consent, DSAR/DSR, data mapping, AI governance, assessments, tracker management and privacy operations.
- Ketch published strengths include consent and cookie/tracker management (a full CMP) - Acompli is not a consent platform and does not scan cookies.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Ketch profile
What Ketch provides
Ketch (US, San Francisco) is enterprise data privacy management software for consent, DSARs, data mapping, AI and assessments, with transparent tiered pricing - a free tier plus paid plans - aimed at mid-market and growing teams.
Ketch has a Free tier (5,000 monthly visitors), Starter at USD 150/month (30,000 visitors/month), Plus at USD 499/month billed annually (100,000 visitors/month), and Pro on custom pricing. DSR automation and data mapping require Plus add-ons or Pro tier and are not included in Starter.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | Enterprise data privacy, consent/CMP, DSR, data mapping, AI, assessments and privacy orchestration. |
| Best-fit buyer | Enterprise and mid-market privacy and marketing teams needing consent, DSAR/DSR, data mapping, AI governance, assessments, tracker management and privacy operations. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | US (San Francisco) vendor. Public vendor pricing shows Free, Starter (around USD 150/month), Plus (from around USD 499/month) and Pro (custom) plans. Capterra lists Ketch as data privacy software; confirm current pricing, ratings and product details before making a buying decision. |
| Deployment / operating model | Enterprise privacy/consent platform with public plan tiers; deployment is website/app/privacy orchestration oriented. |
02Official website signals
What Ketch emphasises on its own website
Ketch positions itself around responsible data use, consent, preference and privacy rights orchestration.
- Official pages emphasise consent and preference management, data subject rights, privacy operations and policy enforcement.
- The strongest public lane is customer-facing privacy experience plus governance over data use choices.
- Ketch is a strong comparator where consent, preferences and rights workflows are the centre of the buying case.
03Published strengths
Ketch products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison is honest about breadth. Ketch is a broad, credible data-privacy platform, and on several fronts it is strongly documented.
- Consent and cookie/tracker management (a full CMP) - Acompli is not a consent platform and does not scan cookies.
- Transparent, self-serve public pricing with a free tier and tiered plans - Acompli prices on scope and does not list public prices.
- Policy/notice and training features, and broad coverage across GDPR, CCPA and US state laws.
- A privacy-orchestration model suited to marketing and data teams managing consent at scale.
04Sourced 2025-2026 signals
What's new at Ketch (2025-2026, sourced)
These sourced updates were researched on 2026-07-05 and are listed separately from the live comparison table so existing profile claims remain unchanged.
Ketch was named a Leader in G2's Summer 2026 reports (announced June 18, 2026), earning 22 badges across 41 reports spanning Consent Management, DSAR, Data Privacy Management, Cookie Tracking and Sensitive Data Discovery categories; G2 shows Ketch at a 4.6/5 rating from 147 reviews, and Ketch states it ranked #1 in Enterprise Usability, Results and Relationship for Consent Management, and #1 in DSAR Momentum (fastest-growing DSAR platform on G2 this quarter). This is independent review-platform data not currently reflected in the comparison page.
On Gartner Peer Insights, Ketch shows a 4.8/5 rating from 28 reviews in the Consent and Preference Management market (independently visible on Gartner's site), while Ketch's own marketing materials claim it is the '#1 ranked consent management platform on Gartner Peer Insights' at 4.9/5 -- these are close but not identical figures, so the vendor's superlative claim should be treated as marketing framing rather than quoted as the raw Gartner figure.
Ketch launched 'Data Sentry' on April 22, 2025, described as the industry's first frontend data map for detecting website privacy vulnerabilities -- it scans actual outbound data packets from a website to surface misconfigured CMPs, tracking pixels firing after opt-out, and unauthorized transfers of sensitive data, positioned as a 'privacy pentest' to pre-empt CIPA/VPPA-style demand letters and regulatory action. This is a distinct product capability (frontend privacy-risk/vulnerability scanning) not captured in the existing capability table, which only records a Y/N for basic cookie/tracker scanning.
Ketch has raised a total of $43M across 2 funding rounds (Series A and A1) from investors including Acrew Capital, CRV and SVB, with its most recent disclosed round in 2021 and no Series B or acquisition activity found through mid-2026. This is useful scale context for the comparison (a well-reviewed but still Series-A-stage vendor) and was not previously documented on the page.
05Comparison context
Ketch alternatives
Ketch is publicly positioned in this market lane: Enterprise data privacy, consent/CMP, DSR, data mapping, AI, assessments and privacy orchestration.
This page profiles Ketch's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
06At a glance
Ketch vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Ketch first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Ketch | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprises and mid-market teams looking for broad data privacy management with consent, cookie management, DSARs, data mapping and assessments across GDPR, CCPA and US state laws. | Privacy teams that need connected GDPR and AI governance records with RoPA, DPIA, risk, vendor and data-map evidence, anchored in Ireland, the UK and the EU. |
| Operating model | A broad US data-privacy and consent platform: consent/CMP, cookie management, DSR, data mapping, AI and assessments with transparent tiered pricing. | Connected, evidence-traceable privacy and AI-governance records across RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and code scan. |
| When to choose it | Choose Ketch when consent, cookie management and broad data-privacy operations across multiple regimes, with transparent self-serve pricing, are central requirements. | Choose Acompli when the buyer needs privacy-governance evidence records and review gates more than consent-first breadth. |
07Capability comparison
Ketch product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Ketch | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | Y | N |
| Breach/incident management | N | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | Y | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | Y | N |
08Ireland & UK
Ketch vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK (the EU-based alternative)
Ketch is US-headquartered and consent-led, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth and provenance of the Article 30 record under EU and UK GDPR. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Ketch and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
09Shortlisting notes
When Ketch belongs on the shortlist
Ketch should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Ketch when consent, cookie management and broad data-privacy operations across multiple regimes, with transparent self-serve pricing, are central requirements.
- Shortlist Acompli when the buyer needs privacy-governance evidence records and review gates more than consent-first breadth.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Ketch questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Ketch alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Data mapping
Build a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, data categories and transfers.
Open moduleAssessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleEU AI Act governance
Document AI systems, assessments, classification decisions and evidence alongside GDPR records.
Open moduleCompare Ketch and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Ketch, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.