Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Keepabl vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Keepabl is profiled first using its public positioning: Approachable, KPI-led GDPR privacy management framework for in-house teams, DPOs, consultants and MSPs. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
Key takeaways
- Keepabl public market lane: Approachable, KPI-led GDPR privacy management framework for in-house teams, DPOs, consultants and MSPs.
- Keepabl best-fit buyer: SME to mid-market UK/EU organisations - and the consultants and MSPs who serve them - wanting a fast-to-adopt GDPR framework (RoPA, assessments, risk, breach, rights, policy pack) with a clear KPI dashboard.
- Keepabl published strengths include A 30-plus document Privacy Policy Pack (from Consent and Breach policies to HR and website privacy notices, DPIA procedures and a DPA checklist) - Acompli does not ship a packaged document library.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Keepabl profile
What Keepabl provides
Keepabl (London, UK; founded 2017 by a TMT lawyer) positions itself as an award-winning, intuitive privacy management framework built initially around GDPR, with familiar workflows that hide the heavy lifting. It has been named to the RegTech100 (2021, 2022, 2023) and is independently penetration-tested and certified to Cyber Essentials Plus each year.
Keepabl's pricing page publishes its plan structure - two families, Governance (unlimited everything excluding Assessments) and Governance Plus (including Assessments) - tiered by total headcount: Small (1-250), Medium (251-500), Large (501-1,000) and Enterprise (1,000+, contact sales). Currencies are GBP, USD and EUR, billed monthly or annually (about 10% off annual), with a 14-day trial. The actual per-tier numbers are not shown on the page itself; buyers see them via a demo or sales contact.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | Approachable, KPI-led GDPR privacy management framework for in-house teams, DPOs, consultants and MSPs. |
| Best-fit buyer | SME to mid-market UK/EU organisations - and the consultants and MSPs who serve them - wanting a fast-to-adopt GDPR framework (RoPA, assessments, risk, breach, rights, policy pack) with a clear KPI dashboard. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | London (UK) vendor; G2 rating around 4.4/5, Capterra around 4.7/5; RegTech100 (2021-2023) and Cyber Essentials Plus. Pricing structure is published (Governance / Governance Plus by headcount tier, GBP/USD/EUR, monthly or annual) but the actual numbers are quoted via demo or sales rather than listed on the page. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS, web-based; a multi-tenanted model lets DPOs, consultants and MSPs run several client organisations from one account. |
02Official website signals
What Keepabl emphasises on its own website
Keepabl positions itself as an intuitive GDPR privacy management framework with an operational dashboard for privacy teams and advisers.
- Official positioning emphasises data mapping, international Article 30 RoPA, assessments, third parties, breach, rights and policy-pack workflows.
- Keepabl is especially relevant for UK/EU teams, DPOs, consultants and MSPs that want a fast-start GDPR operating framework.
- The comparison should treat Keepabl as a privacy-management platform with practical implementation aids, not only as a RoPA tool.
03Published strengths
Keepabl products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what Keepabl does well. Keepabl is an established, award-winning framework, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- A 30-plus document Privacy Policy Pack (from Consent and Breach policies to HR and website privacy notices, DPIA procedures and a DPA checklist) - Acompli does not ship a packaged document library.
- An intuitive, KPI-led dashboard - Privacy KPIs on one pane of glass, each tile linking into the underlying module - and a fast, low-expertise onboarding experience.
- A built-in training module (Privacy Kitchen video help) and breach auto-discovery within the Breach module.
- A multi-tenanted model purpose-built for DPOs, consultants and MSPs to manage multiple client organisations, each with its own departments, from one account.
04Sourced 2025-2026 signals
What's new at Keepabl (2025-2026, sourced)
These sourced updates were researched on 2026-07-05 and are listed separately from the live comparison table so existing profile claims remain unchanged.
Keepabl won a Netty Award for "Best Compliance Software (Privacy Management)" in the Apps & Software category in June 2024, and was shortlisted in the "Most Innovative Platform/Software of the Year" category at the 2025 PICCASO Awards Europe. Both are vendor-claimed recognitions; the PICCASO shortlist is independently confirmed on the awards body's own site.
Keepabl was named the exclusive approved Privacy Management Software for LOCS:23, a UK ICO-approved certification scheme (under Article 42 UK GDPR) for legal service providers and their vendors/solution partners, run by scheme owner 2twenty4 Consulting. This is a vendor-published claim (dated around February 2024) and gives Keepabl a distinct vertical foothold in the UK legal sector not reflected in the current comparison page.
As of mid-2026, Keepabl's Capterra UK rating of 4.7/5 is based on only 3 reviews (ease of use 4.7, customer support 5.0, value for money 4.7, features 4.7, 100% likelihood-to-recommend), and its G2 rating of 4.4/5 is based on 15 reviews. The existing page states both averages but not the underlying review counts, which are relevant context for how much weight to give a small third-party sample.
No funding rounds, acquisitions, security incidents, or leadership changes were found for Keepabl in 2025-2026; the company's last reported funding was a seed round in March 2024 ($314K total raised across two rounds per Crunchbase-sourced aggregation), and headcount is reported at around 7 employees as of January 2026.
05Comparison context
Keepabl alternatives
Keepabl is publicly positioned in this market lane: Approachable, KPI-led GDPR privacy management framework for in-house teams, DPOs, consultants and MSPs.
This page profiles Keepabl's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
06At a glance
Keepabl vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Keepabl first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Keepabl | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams, DPOs, consultants and MSPs that want an approachable, KPI-led GDPR framework out of the box with a built-in policy pack and multi-client support. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | An intuitive GDPR privacy management framework spanning international RoPA, assessments, risk maps, breach, rights/FOI, third parties, tasks, training and a policy pack. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Keepabl when its quick-start framework, KPI dashboard, policy pack and multi-tenant consultant model match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
07Capability comparison
Keepabl product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Keepabl | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | N | Y |
| Consent management | N | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | N | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | Y | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
08Ireland & UK
Keepabl vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Keepabl is London-based and built for the EU/UK market, and Acompli is Dublin-based, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance. Keepabl's international RoPA produces both controller and processor Article 30 outputs at one click.
For both Keepabl and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
09Shortlisting notes
When Keepabl belongs on the shortlist
Keepabl should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Keepabl when its quick-start framework, KPI dashboard, policy pack and multi-tenant consultant model match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Keepabl questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Keepabl alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Keepabl and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Keepabl, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.