Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Holistic AI vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Holistic AI is profiled first using its public positioning: Enterprise AI-governance platform for AI discovery, inventory, technical risk testing, monitoring and enforcement, aligned to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Holistic AI alternativeAI governanceEU AI ActAI registerEvidence
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
On this page
Key takeaways
- Holistic AI public market lane: Enterprise AI-governance platform for AI discovery, inventory, technical risk testing, monitoring and enforcement, aligned to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
- Holistic AI best-fit buyer: Large enterprises and regulated organisations deploying many AI models, agents and applications that need to surface shadow AI and prove those systems are safe, unbiased and compliant at scale.
- Holistic AI published strengths include automated AI discovery and a live inventory - scanning cloud platforms, code repositories, data platforms and SaaS across 20+ integrations to surface shadow AI and track ownership, lifecycle and business purpose. Acompli maintains a curated AI-system register but does not auto-discover AI across the estate.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Holistic AI profile
What Holistic AI provides
Holistic AI is a London-headquartered enterprise AI-governance platform that grew out of research by two University College London academics, Emre Kazim and Adriano Koshiyama, and evolved from a bias-auditing specialist into a full-lifecycle AI-governance platform. It frames its product in three stages - Identify (automated AI discovery and a live inventory across cloud, code, SaaS and vendors, to eliminate shadow AI), Protect (40+ technical tests for bias, safety, security and performance, including red teaming and LLM evaluation) and Enforce (deployment gates, approval workflows, kill switches and Guardian Agents that intervene in real time), with risk scores mapped to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
Holistic AI does not publish list pricing on its own site. The platform is enterprise, demo-led and contact-sales - the site directs buyers to request a demo rather than to a public price page, and pricing scales with the size and complexity of the AI estate. Note that this is an AI-governance tool, not a GDPR privacy-ops platform: it governs AI systems (discovery, inventory, testing, monitoring), and does not provide RoPA, DPIA, DSAR or data-mapping records.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | Enterprise AI-governance platform for AI discovery, inventory, technical risk testing, monitoring and enforcement, aligned to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. |
| Best-fit buyer | Large enterprises and regulated organisations deploying many AI models, agents and applications that need to surface shadow AI and prove those systems are safe, unbiased and compliant at scale. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | London (UK) vendor, UCL research origins. No public list pricing - enterprise, demo-led, contact-sales. Rated 4/5 from a small number of reviews on Gartner Peer Insights at the time of writing; also listed as an AI-assurance technique on GOV.UK and in the OECD.AI catalogue. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS AI-governance platform with 20+ integrations across cloud, code repositories, data platforms and SaaS; automated discovery, technical testing, continuous monitoring and runtime enforcement via Guardian Agents. |
02Official website signals
What Holistic AI emphasises on its own website
Holistic AI positions itself as an enterprise AI governance platform for AI discovery, inventory, risk, testing and compliance.
- Official pages emphasise shadow AI discovery, AI inventory, monitoring, AI risk management, LLM testing, bias audits and regulatory alignment.
- The product lane is dedicated AI governance rather than general GDPR privacy management.
- Holistic AI is strongest where AI model, agent and application oversight is the main procurement requirement.
03Published strengths
Holistic AI products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Holistic AI is a serious, category-leading platform for technical AI assurance, and for that problem it is the stronger tool - Acompli does not do model-level bias and robustness testing, automated shadow-AI discovery or runtime monitoring. Acompli's strength lies elsewhere: first-class EU AI Act governance - risk classification, an AI-system register and conformity workflow, human-approved and connected to the wider GDPR programme.
- Automated AI discovery and a live inventory - scanning cloud platforms, code repositories, data platforms and SaaS across 20+ integrations to surface shadow AI and track ownership, lifecycle and business purpose. Acompli maintains a curated AI-system register but does not auto-discover AI across the estate.
- Deep technical risk testing - 40+ tests for bias, robustness, safety, security and performance, plus red teaming, LLM evaluation and jailbreak-resistance checks. Acompli assesses AI systems for governance and DPIA, not model-level bias or robustness.
- Continuous monitoring and runtime enforcement - drift and degradation detection with Guardian Agents (Sentinel for observation, Operative for real-time intervention, deployment gates and kill switches). Acompli is a records and evidence layer, not a runtime control plane.
- Framework mapping to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 with audit-ready evidence, plus recognition on GOV.UK's AI-assurance catalogue and OECD.AI - strong credibility for an enterprise AI-governance programme.
04Sourced 2025-2026 signals
What's new at Holistic AI (2025-2026, sourced)
These sourced updates were researched on 2026-07-05 and are listed separately from the live comparison table so existing profile claims remain unchanged.
On 25 June 2026, Holistic AI announced that Vahé Torossian — a 31-year Microsoft veteran (former President of Western Europe and Corporate VP for global SMB/Business Applications), former President/Deputy CEO of Builder.ai, and now a Venture Partner at Tola Capital — has joined its Board of Directors, with Co-CEO Emre Kazim framing it around scaling the platform and deepening enterprise relationships globally.
On 29 September 2025, Holistic AI launched the 'LLM Decision Hub,' a free public resource (hosted at llmleaderboard.ai) that ranks 20+ leading LLMs on performance, safety, coding ability, mathematical reasoning, jailbreak resistance and total cost of ownership, using Holistic AI's own red-teaming and independent benchmark data — a model-selection/benchmarking capability not reflected in the existing capability table, which covers AI governance/registry functions only.
Holistic AI was named one of five vendors in Gartner's 'Cool Vendors for AI Security' report (published ~23 October 2024, announced by the vendor on 7 November 2024) — a separate Gartner recognition from the 4/5 Gartner Peer Insights review rating already cited on the page, and not currently mentioned anywhere in the existing profile.
On 16 December 2024, Holistic AI completed what it and press coverage describe as the world's first independent third-party audit of Wikipedia under the EU Digital Services Act (Wikipedia being one of 23 EU-designated Very Large Online Platforms) — one of only two smaller/specialist firms (alongside FTI Consulting, which audited X) to land a VLOP audit, versus the Big Four firms auditing the rest. This shows Holistic AI has expanded from AI-governance software into independent regulatory-audit services under the DSA, a framework not mentioned anywhere in the existing profile (which cites only EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001).
05Comparison context
Holistic AI alternatives
Holistic AI is publicly positioned in this market lane: Enterprise AI-governance platform for AI discovery, inventory, technical risk testing, monitoring and enforcement, aligned to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
This page profiles Holistic AI's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
06At a glance
Holistic AI vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Holistic AI first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Holistic AI | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprises that need to discover, inventory, technically test and monitor AI systems at scale against the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. | Privacy and governance teams that need first-class EU AI Act governance - a risk-classified AI-system register, conformity and assessment workflow, and human-approved AI-system records - connected to their GDPR programme (RoPA, DPIA, vendor, data mapping) for Ireland/UK/EU. |
| Operating model | An end-to-end AI-governance platform: automated AI discovery, live inventory, technical risk testing, continuous monitoring and real-time enforcement. | First-class EU AI Act governance - AI-system register, risk classification and conformity/assessment workflow - connected to DPIA and Article 30, each value human-approved and traceable to approved source evidence. |
| When to choose it | Choose Holistic AI when the main problem is surfacing shadow AI and proving AI systems are safe, unbiased and compliant through continuous technical testing. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is defensible EU AI Act compliance - classifying and governing AI systems - kept connected to RoPA, assessments, suppliers and risk decisions, and current after human approval. |
07Capability comparison
Holistic AI product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Holistic AI | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | N | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | N | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | N | N |
| Data mapping | N | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | N | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | N | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | N | N |
| Breach/incident management | N | N |
| Retention management | N | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | N | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | N | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | N | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | N | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
08Ireland & UK
Holistic AI vs Acompli for the EU AI Act and Article 30 in Ireland and the UK
Holistic AI and Acompli both govern AI against the EU AI Act, but from opposite ends. Holistic AI maps AI systems technically to the EU AI Act's risk-based tiers, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001, producing evidence that a model is tested, monitored and enforced. Acompli governs the same regulation from the compliance-record side: an AI-system register with EU AI Act risk classification and a conformity/assessment workflow, sitting beside RoPA and DPIA, where AI-system records are classified, assessed and human-approved, and where the AI register connects to Article 30 processing and the transfers behind it. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2) - and the Irish DPC and UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Holistic AI and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
09Shortlisting notes
When Holistic AI belongs on the shortlist
Holistic AI should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Holistic AI when the main problem is surfacing shadow AI and proving AI systems are safe, unbiased and compliant through continuous technical testing.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is defensible EU AI Act compliance - classifying and governing AI systems - kept connected to RoPA, assessments, suppliers and risk decisions, and current after human approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Holistic AI questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Holistic AI alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Holistic AI and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Holistic AI, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.