Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
GDPR Register vs Acompli: product and service comparison
GDPR Register is profiled first using its public positioning: European GDPR compliance platform. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
Key takeaways
- GDPR Register public market lane: European GDPR compliance platform.
- GDPR Register best-fit buyer: SMEs and privacy teams wanting RoPA, DPIA, LIA, vendor reviews, risk assessments, breach logs, DSARs and AI Act workflows in one structured system.
- GDPR Register published strengths include A structured, audit-ready all-in-one GDPR compliance feature set covering RoPA, DPIA, LIA, vendors and risk.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01GDPR Register profile
What GDPR Register provides
GDPR Register is structured EU GDPR compliance software for RoPAs, DPIAs, LIAs, vendors, risk assessments, breach logs, data subject requests and AI Act workflows in one audit-ready platform.
GDPR Register publishes Essential at EUR 350/month (annual) or EUR 410/month (monthly), Pro at EUR 425/month (annual) or EUR 490/month (monthly), and Governance on custom pricing (contact sales). Unlimited users per legal entity are included on all plans. EU AI Act is an optional add-on on Essential and Pro; included in Governance. Free demo available, no credit card required.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | European GDPR compliance platform. |
| Best-fit buyer | SMEs and privacy teams wanting RoPA, DPIA, LIA, vendor reviews, risk assessments, breach logs, DSARs and AI Act workflows in one structured system. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | Capterra directory data: 5.0/5 from 3 reviews and a starting price from around EUR 350/month (billed annually); the vendor also has a public pricing page. Confirm current pricing, ratings and product details before making a buying decision. |
| Deployment / operating model | GDPR compliance software platform; public materials do not expand the exact deployment model. |
02Official website signals
What GDPR Register emphasises on its own website
GDPR Register presents itself as GDPR software for documenting and managing compliance obligations.
- Official positioning centres on maintaining GDPR records and operational registers rather than broad security compliance.
- The comparator lane is privacy administration: RoPA-style records, assessments, processors, breaches and tasks.
- Buyers should verify how far the official module set covers DSAR, data mapping, Article 30 processor records and export evidence.
03Published strengths
GDPR Register products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the structured platform does well. GDPR Register is a credible, audit-ready GDPR compliance platform, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- A structured, audit-ready all-in-one GDPR compliance feature set covering RoPA, DPIA, LIA, vendors and risk.
- A dedicated breach/incident management module - Acompli has breach guidance but no dedicated breach workflow.
- Transparent public pricing (from around EUR 350/month, billed annually) and a simple, structured setup - Acompli prices on scope.
- Data processing agreements, task management and multi-company setups in a single structured platform.
04Sourced 2025-2026 signals
What's new at GDPR Register (2025-2026, sourced)
These sourced updates were researched on 2026-07-05 and are listed separately from the live comparison table so existing profile claims remain unchanged.
GDPR Register's official pricing page (fetched July 2026) now lists the Pro tier at EUR 475/month billed annually (EUR 545/month billed monthly) — up from the EUR 425/EUR 490 figures currently cited on the Acompli comparison page. The Essential tier is unchanged at EUR 350/month annual (EUR 410/month monthly), and Governance remains custom/contact-sales.
The Pro tier now explicitly bundles 'Automatic Vendor Discovery' and an 'Ask AI Assistant' feature alongside LIA, DPIA and Risk Management — capability names not currently reflected in the comparison page's description of GDPR Register's feature set.
GDPR Register's own pricing page lists a 'Data Privacy Audit' feature as 'launching in 2026' on the Governance tier. This is a vendor roadmap claim, not a confirmed shipped feature, and should be treated as forward-looking rather than current capability.
GDPR Register's Security page states its primary hosting is AWS EU-Central (Frankfurt, Germany), with disaster-recovery backup in AWS Ireland and an offsite encrypted backup at a Zone Media data center in Tallinn, Estonia — a specific EU data-residency detail (including an Ireland-region backup) not currently included in the comparison page's security/jurisdiction discussion.
GDPR Register's About page states the company was founded in 2017 by legal professionals from Hedman Law Firm and is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia; it credits CEO Krete Paal with prior experience as a DPO for the Estonian Police and Border Guard Board and later at Veriff. This is the vendor's own self-reported 'built by privacy practitioners' framing, not independently verified, but is a positioning detail not currently reflected on the comparison page.
Independent of the Capterra data already cited (5.0/5 from 3 reviews), G2 separately lists GDPR Register at 5.0/5 stars but based on only 1 review as of this search — a thin, distinct review base worth citing alongside Capterra rather than instead of it if the review-signal section is expanded.
05Comparison context
GDPR Register alternatives
GDPR Register is publicly positioned in this market lane: European GDPR compliance platform.
This page profiles GDPR Register's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
06At a glance
GDPR Register vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles GDPR Register first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | GDPR Register | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams looking for a structured, audit-ready GDPR compliance platform centred on RoPA, DPIA, LIA, vendors, risk assessments, breach handling and AI Act, with public pricing. | DPO-led teams that need connected records, provenance, imported evidence and reviewed outputs across GDPR and AI workflows, anchored in Ireland, the UK and the EU. |
| Operating model | A structured, audit-ready EU GDPR compliance platform: RoPA, DPIA, LIA, vendors, risk assessments, breach logs and AI Act workflows. | Connected, evidence-traceable privacy and AI-governance records across RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and code scan. |
| When to choose it | Choose GDPR Register when its structured GDPR compliance feature set, breach handling and transparent public pricing match the team's operating needs. | Choose Acompli when the comparison turns on evidence provenance, imports, connected outputs and human-reviewed automation. |
07Capability comparison
GDPR Register product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | GDPR Register | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | N | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | N | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | N | N |
| Training module | N | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | Y | N |
08Ireland & UK
GDPR Register vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Both are EU-built GDPR platforms, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth and provenance of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both GDPR Register and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
09Shortlisting notes
When GDPR Register belongs on the shortlist
GDPR Register should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist GDPR Register when its structured GDPR compliance feature set, breach handling and transparent public pricing match the team's operating needs.
- Shortlist Acompli when the comparison turns on evidence provenance, imports, connected outputs and human-reviewed automation.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
GDPR Register questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a GDPR Register alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
RoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleAssessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleEU AI Act governance
Document AI systems, assessments, classification decisions and evidence alongside GDPR records.
Open moduleCompare GDPR Register and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by GDPR Register, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.