Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Enactia vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Enactia is profiled first using its public positioning: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Enactia alternativeRoPADPIAGRCEvidence
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
On this page
Key takeaways
- Enactia public market lane: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance.
- Enactia best-fit buyer: SME to enterprise organisations - often with combined data-protection and information-security mandates - that want a broad, multi-framework GRC programme cross-mapping GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes in one platform, with breach and whistleblowing handling.
- Enactia published strengths include multi-framework cross-mapping - its 'Compliance Universe' maps one control set across GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes, useful for teams carrying combined privacy and security mandates.
- The capability rows are evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, and "N" means not clearly evidenced here.
Comparison workflow
From company profile to shortlist decision
01Enactia profileWhat Enactia provides02Official website signalsWhat Enactia emphasises on its own website03Published strengthsEnactia products, services and stated strengths04Comparison contextEnactia alternatives05At a glanceEnactia vs Acompli at a glance06Capability comparisonEnactia product and service coverage compared with Acompli07Ireland & UKEnactia vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Market lanechecked
Best-fit buyerchecked
Public strengthschecked
Capability evidencechecked
Overlapchecked
Gapschecked
Exportschecked
Shortlist fitchecked
01Enactia profile
What Enactia provides
Enactia (Nicosia, Cyprus, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh) positions itself as an AI-powered GRC platform for cybersecurity and data-protection governance, risk and compliance. Its 'Compliance Universe' cross-maps a single control set across many frameworks - GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes - and the vendor is itself ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II attested.
Pricing signal reviewed on 1 July 2026: Enactia does not publish standard list prices. It uses a customisable, employee-scaled subscription (billed monthly or annually) with tiers commonly cited as Startups (up to 10 employees), Small (up to 50), Medium (up to 250), Large (up to 1,500) and Enterprise (unlimited), plus an on-premise option. Third-party listings reference figures from around USD 450 up to large enterprise quotes (one aggregator cites roughly USD 42,700/year for a 200-user enterprise plan), but the vendor itself directs buyers to a demo and custom quote. A free trial is offered with no card required. Buyers should verify current scope, plan limits, module inclusions and contract terms directly with Enactia.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance. |
| Best-fit buyer | SME to enterprise organisations - often with combined data-protection and information-security mandates - that want a broad, multi-framework GRC programme cross-mapping GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes in one platform, with breach and whistleblowing handling. |
| Review / pricing signal | Cypriot (Nicosia) vendor, ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II attested, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh. No public list price - pricing is demo-led and quoted on employee count; third-party listings cite figures from around USD 450 upward. Aggregator ratings are strong (for example 5.0/5 on Capterra and GetApp) but sit on a small number of reviews. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS GRC platform (web, plus mobile access), with an on-premise installation option via professional services; modular suite covering compliance assessments, policy, ROPA, DPIA, risk, vendor, incident/breach, whistleblowing and AI governance. |
02Official website signals
What Enactia emphasises on its own website
Enactia positions itself as an AI-powered governance, risk, compliance and privacy platform. Official source reviewed on 30 June 2026.
- Official pages emphasise GRC, privacy, policy development, compliance assessments, risk and cross-mapped controls.
- The public lane covers multiple frameworks and regulations, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PDPL, HIPAA, DORA and NIS2.
- Enactia is best compared where GDPR must sit inside a broader security, risk and compliance programme.
03Published strengths
Enactia products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Enactia is an established, broad, AI-assisted GRC suite, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- Multi-framework cross-mapping - its 'Compliance Universe' maps one control set across GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes, useful for teams carrying combined privacy and security mandates.
- Incident and data-breach management as a packaged module, with an incident register - Acompli does not package breach/incident management.
- Broader security-GRC scope than a privacy-only tool: whistleblowing management, asset management and policy management alongside the privacy modules.
- Vendor-held ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type II attestation, plus a free trial (no card required), which some buyers weigh heavily when shortlisting.
04Comparison context
Enactia alternatives
Enactia is publicly positioned in this market lane: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance.
This page profiles Enactia's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, review and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
The comparison is evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, while "N" means not clearly evidenced here rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
05At a glance
Enactia vs Acompli at a glance
Published by Acompli and last reviewed on 30 June 2026. This page profiles Enactia first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Enactia | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want a broad, AI-assisted, multi-framework GRC suite that cross-maps GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA and NIS2 in one platform. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | A broad GRC platform spanning privacy management, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk, policy and AI governance across many frameworks. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
06Capability comparison
Enactia product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in public sources reviewed for this comparison.
| Capability | Enactia | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | Y |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | N | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | N | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | N | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | N | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | N | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | N | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
07Ireland & UK
Enactia vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Enactia is built as a multi-framework GRC suite spanning many jurisdictions and standards, while Acompli is built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Enactia and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
08Shortlisting notes
When Enactia belongs on the shortlist
Enactia should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Enactia questions answered
What is Enactia?
Enactia is profiled here in this market lane: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance. Enactia (Nicosia, Cyprus, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh) positions itself as an AI-powered GRC platform for cybersecurity and data-protection governance, risk and compliance. Its 'Compliance Universe' cross-maps a single control set across many frameworks - GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes - and the vendor is itself ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II attested.
What does Enactia provide?
Enactia provides the products, services or modules publicly evidenced in the capability table on this page. The table covers RoPA, DPIA/PIA assessments, DSAR/privacy rights, data mapping, vendor risk, privacy risk, AI governance, consent, cookie scanning, breach, retention, policy, training, workflow, audit and export signals.
Who is Enactia best suited for?
Enactia is best suited for SME to enterprise organisations - often with combined data-protection and information-security mandates - that want a broad, multi-framework GRC programme cross-mapping GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes in one platform, with breach and whistleblowing handling. Buyers should still verify current product scope, service scope, contract terms and implementation requirements directly with Enactia.
What are Enactia's main product or service strengths?
Enactia's published strengths include Multi-framework cross-mapping - its 'Compliance Universe' maps one control set across GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes, useful for teams carrying combined privacy and security mandates; Incident and data-breach management as a packaged module, with an incident register - Acompli does not package breach/incident management; Broader security-GRC scope than a privacy-only tool: whistleblowing management, asset management and policy management alongside the privacy modules.
What is Enactia's pricing or review signal?
Enactia's pricing or review signal in this profile is: Pricing signal reviewed on 1 July 2026: Enactia does not publish standard list prices. It uses a customisable, employee-scaled subscription (billed monthly or annually) with tiers commonly cited as Startups (up to 10 employees), Small (up to 50), Medium (up to 250), Large (up to 1,500) and Enterprise (unlimited), plus an on-premise option. Third-party listings reference figures from around USD 450 up to large enterprise quotes (one aggregator cites roughly USD 42,700/year for a 200-user enterprise plan), but the vendor itself directs buyers to a demo and custom quote. A free trial is offered with no card required. Buyers should verify current scope, plan limits, module inclusions and contract terms directly with Enactia. This page was last reviewed on 30 June 2026, and buyers should verify current pricing, ratings, plan limits, implementation fees and service scope directly with Enactia.
Does Enactia support GDPR Article 30 RoPA?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for RoPA / Article 30 in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Enactia support DPIA or privacy assessments?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for DPIA/PIA assessments in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Enactia support DSAR or privacy rights workflows?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for DSAR / privacy rights in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Enactia provide data mapping?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for Data mapping in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Enactia provide vendor risk or third-party privacy risk management?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for Vendor risk in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Enactia provide consent management or cookie scanning?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for Consent management in the reviewed source set. Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Enactia is marked N for Cookie/tracker scanning here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as not clearly evidenced for consent management and not clearly evidenced for cookie/tracker scanning, so buyers needing either capability should verify live vendor scope before procurement.
Does Enactia provide AI governance?
Yes. Enactia is marked as publicly evidenced for AI governance in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
How should buyers read the Enactia vs Acompli capability table?
The table records public evidence found for each supplier. "Y" means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in reviewed public sources; "N" means it was not clearly evidenced here, not proof that the supplier cannot provide it.
What are Enactia alternatives?
Enactia alternatives depend on the buyer's exact requirement, because Enactia's strongest fit is: Choose Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. The shortlist may include broad privacy platforms, GRC tools, specialist consent or DSAR tools, service providers, and Acompli where the buyer needs overlapping privacy-governance workflows shown in the table.
How does Enactia compare with Acompli?
Enactia should be assessed first on its own published fit: Choose Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. Acompli is included as a factual overlap point where the requirement is: Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. Buyers should ask both suppliers to demonstrate the same workflow with current product screens, exports and implementation assumptions.
When should buyers shortlist Enactia?
Buyers should shortlist Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. They should only compare Acompli for the overlapping requirements shown on this page, and they should keep any specialist supplier that covers a requirement neither platform clearly evidences.
How current is this Enactia profile?
This profile was last reviewed on 30 June 2026. Ratings, pricing, product names, plan limits and service scope can change, so buyers should treat this as a comparison guide and verify current details with Enactia before procurement.
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Enactia alternative
Who are Enactia's competitors?
Enactia's main competitors in privacy and GRC management include OneTrust, TrustArc, Vanta, Drata and other multi-framework GRC platforms, alongside privacy-native tools. Acompli competes as a focused, privacy-native alternative for Ireland, UK and EU teams that want connected, evidence-traceable RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendor and AI-governance records with human approval, rather than a broad multi-framework GRC suite.
Is Acompli a good Enactia alternative?
Acompli is a strong Enactia alternative when the priority is a defensible, assessment-fed privacy record rather than breadth of frameworks. RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records are connected, confidence-scored, human-approved and exportable for the DPC or ICO. Enactia remains the better fit if you specifically need multi-framework security-GRC cross-mapping across ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA and NIS2, or its packaged breach and whistleblowing modules.
Does Acompli replace Enactia?
Acompli can replace Enactia for the core privacy-operations workflows - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, privacy risk, vendor records, data mapping and EU AI Act governance - for many teams. It does not replace Enactia's broader security-GRC scope, such as ISO 27001/SOC 2 cross-mapping, incident/breach management or whistleblowing; teams that rely on those keep them alongside Acompli or stay with Enactia.
How do Enactia and Acompli differ?
Enactia is a broad, AI-assisted, multi-framework GRC suite - privacy management plus security-compliance cross-mapping (ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, DORA, NIS2, Gulf PDPL), incident/breach and whistleblowing - registered in Cyprus with global offices. Acompli is narrower and deeper on governed privacy records: assessment-fed Article 30 records, data mapping, AI-Act governance and code-scan evidence, each traceable to its source and human-approved, built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO.
Does Enactia publish pricing, and does Acompli?
Enactia does not publish a standard list price. Pricing is demo-led and quoted on employee count (tiers commonly cited from Startups up to Enterprise, plus on-premise), with a free trial that requires no card; third-party listings reference figures from around USD 450 upward. Acompli also prices on scope (legal entities, jurisdictions, users and integrations) and provides pricing on request rather than a public list price, because the effort scales with the programme rather than the number of logins.
What is the best Enactia alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams?
The best Enactia alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams is one built around GDPR Article 30 coverage, DPC and ICO fit, and a self-contained per-entity export. Acompli is built around exactly those - both Article 30(1) and 30(2) records, EU and UK GDPR distinguished on one register, and an export the DPC or ICO can read without a platform login - the provenance wedge a broad, framework-mapping GRC suite does not foreground.
Does Enactia have an EU AI Act or AI governance module?
Yes - Enactia offers an AI governance capability aligned to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act, including an AI model registry (mapping each model, its version history, training-data sources and intended use), AI impact assessment and AI transparency logging. Acompli's AI governance module similarly supports EU AI Act risk classification, assessment-driven AI-system records and human approval of each AI-system entry, with the record traceable to its evidence source. Both serve AI governance; the difference is Acompli's provenance and per-entity export wedge rather than the presence of an AI register itself.
Is Enactia a full security-GRC platform or a privacy tool?
Enactia is a broad GRC platform rather than a privacy-only tool: alongside RoPA, DPIA and DSAR it cross-maps security frameworks (ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, DORA, NIS2) and adds incident/breach management, whistleblowing management, asset management and policy management. Acompli is privacy-native and focuses on connected, human-approved privacy records with evidence provenance; teams needing full security-GRC cross-mapping would keep Enactia or a dedicated security-compliance tool alongside Acompli.
Does Enactia handle data breaches and incidents?
Yes - Enactia packages incident and data-breach management with an incident register, which is one of its genuine strengths and part of why it suits combined privacy-and-security teams. Acompli does not package breach/incident management; it focuses on connected RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendor and AI-governance records. Teams that need a packaged breach module would keep Enactia or a dedicated incident tool alongside Acompli's governed records.
Where is Enactia based, and why might that matter?
Enactia is registered in Nicosia, Cyprus, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh, and holds ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 Type II attestation - useful signals for security-conscious buyers and for organisations with Gulf PDPL obligations. Acompli serves Irish, UK and EU teams with a focus on DPC and ICO fit and a self-contained per-entity export. Teams whose deciding factor is multi-region, multi-framework GRC breadth may prefer Enactia; teams whose deciding factor is evidence provenance and a defensible Article 30 record may prefer Acompli.
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleDSAR management
Manage requests from intake to archive with deadlines, identity checks, redaction and audit history.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Enactia and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Enactia, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.