Competitor profile

Enactia vs Acompli: product and service comparison

Enactia is profiled first using its public positioning: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.

Book a walkthrough View all comparisons

Enactia alternativeRoPADPIAGRCEvidence

Comparison briefComparison evidence lens

Compared companyEnactia

Compared againstAcompli

enactia.com

acompli.ie

Fit checkBuyer, workflow, scope

Evidence testSource, claim, caveat

Coverage8 sections, 3 tables

Outputs1 linked options

Fit

Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.

Evidence

Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.

Operations

How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.

Decision

The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.

On this page

Key takeaways

Enactia public market lane: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance.
Enactia best-fit buyer: SME to enterprise organisations - often with combined data-protection and information-security mandates - that want a broad, multi-framework GRC programme cross-mapping GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes in one platform, with breach and whistleblowing handling.
Enactia published strengths include multi-framework cross-mapping - its 'Compliance Universe' maps one control set across GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes, useful for teams carrying combined privacy and security mandates.
The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.

01Enactia profile

What Enactia provides

Enactia (Nicosia, Cyprus, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh) positions itself as an AI-powered GRC platform for cybersecurity and data-protection governance, risk and compliance. Its 'Compliance Universe' cross-maps a single control set across many frameworks - GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes - and the vendor is itself ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II attested.

Enactia does not publish standard list prices. It uses a customisable, employee-scaled subscription (billed monthly or annually) with tiers commonly cited as Startups (up to 10 employees), Small (up to 50), Medium (up to 250), Large (up to 1,500) and Enterprise (unlimited), plus an on-premise option. Third-party listings reference figures from around USD 450 up to large enterprise quotes (one aggregator cites roughly USD 42,700/year for a 200-user enterprise plan), but the vendor itself directs buyers to a demo and custom quote. A free trial is offered with no card required.

Signal	Details
Market lane	AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance.
Best-fit buyer	SME to enterprise organisations - often with combined data-protection and information-security mandates - that want a broad, multi-framework GRC programme cross-mapping GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes in one platform, with breach and whistleblowing handling.
Ratings / pricing signal	Cypriot (Nicosia) vendor, ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II attested, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh. No public list price - pricing is demo-led and quoted on employee count; third-party listings cite figures from around USD 450 upward. Aggregator ratings are strong (for example 5.0/5 on Capterra and GetApp) but sit on a small number of reviews.
Deployment / operating model	Cloud SaaS GRC platform (web, plus mobile access), with an on-premise installation option via professional services; modular suite covering compliance assessments, policy, ROPA, DPIA, risk, vendor, incident/breach, whistleblowing and AI governance.

02Official website signals

What Enactia emphasises on its own website

Enactia positions itself as an AI-powered governance, risk, compliance and privacy platform.

Enactia official website

Open the official Enactia source used for this profile refresh.

Explore

Official pages emphasise GRC, privacy, policy development, compliance assessments, risk and cross-mapped controls.
The public lane covers multiple frameworks and regulations, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PDPL, HIPAA, DORA and NIS2.
Enactia is best compared where GDPR must sit inside a broader security, risk and compliance programme.

1 / 2

03Published strengths

Enactia products, services and stated strengths

A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Enactia is an established, broad, AI-assisted GRC suite, and for some buyers it is the better choice.

Multi-framework cross-mapping - its 'Compliance Universe' maps one control set across GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes, useful for teams carrying combined privacy and security mandates.
Incident and data-breach management as a packaged module, with an incident register - Acompli does not package breach/incident management.
Broader security-GRC scope than a privacy-only tool: whistleblowing management, asset management and policy management alongside the privacy modules.
Vendor-held ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type II attestation, plus a free trial (no card required), which some buyers weigh heavily when shortlisting.

04Comparison context

Enactia alternatives

Enactia is publicly positioned in this market lane: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance.

This page profiles Enactia's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.

"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.

05At a glance

Enactia vs Acompli at a glance

This page profiles Enactia first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.

Decision question	Enactia	Acompli
Best fit	Teams that want a broad, AI-assisted, multi-framework GRC suite that cross-maps GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA and NIS2 in one platform.	Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows.
Operating model	A broad GRC platform spanning privacy management, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk, policy and AI governance across many frameworks.	Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record.
When to choose it	Choose Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run.	Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.

06Capability comparison

Enactia product and service coverage compared with Acompli

Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.

* "N" means this capability was not publicly confirmed at the time of writing - not proof the vendor lacks it. "Y" means it was publicly documented. Confirm current features directly with each vendor.
Capability	Enactia	Acompli
DPIA/PIA assessments	Y	Y
RoPA / Article 30	Y	Y
DSAR / privacy rights	Y	N
Data mapping	Y	Y
Vendor risk	Y	Y
Privacy risk	Y	Y
AI governance	Y	Y
Consent management	Y	N
Cookie/tracker scanning	N	N
Breach/incident management	Y	N
Retention management	N	Y
Policy/notice management	Y	N
Training module	N	N
Approval workflows	Y	Y
Audit trail	Y	Y
Role-based access control	Y	Y
Multi-entity support	N	Y
Spreadsheet import	N	Y
PDF/CSV/Excel export	N	Y
Public pricing	N	N

07Ireland & UK

Enactia vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK

Enactia is built as a multi-framework GRC suite spanning many jurisdictions and standards, while Acompli is built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.

For both Enactia and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.

EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.

08Shortlisting notes

When Enactia belongs on the shortlist

Enactia should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.

Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.

Shortlist Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run.
Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.

Comparison FAQ

Enactia questions answered

What is Enactia?

Enactia is profiled here in this market lane: AI-powered, multi-framework GRC platform spanning data protection, security compliance, incident/breach, vendor risk and AI governance. Enactia (Nicosia, Cyprus, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh) positions itself as an AI-powered GRC platform for cybersecurity and data-protection governance, risk and compliance. Its 'Compliance Universe' cross-maps a single control set across many frameworks - GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes - and the vendor is itself ISO 27001 certified and SOC 2 Type II attested.

What does Enactia provide?

Enactia provides the products, services or modules publicly evidenced in the capability table on this page. The table covers RoPA, DPIA/PIA assessments, DSAR/privacy rights, data mapping, vendor risk, privacy risk, AI governance, consent, cookie scanning, breach, retention, policy, training, workflow, audit and export signals.

Who is Enactia best suited for?

Enactia is best suited for SME to enterprise organisations - often with combined data-protection and information-security mandates - that want a broad, multi-framework GRC programme cross-mapping GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes in one platform, with breach and whistleblowing handling. Buyers should still verify current product scope, service scope, contract terms and implementation requirements directly with Enactia.

What are Enactia's main product or service strengths?

Enactia's published strengths include Multi-framework cross-mapping - its 'Compliance Universe' maps one control set across GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, DORA, NIS2 and Gulf PDPL regimes, useful for teams carrying combined privacy and security mandates; Incident and data-breach management as a packaged module, with an incident register - Acompli does not package breach/incident management; Broader security-GRC scope than a privacy-only tool: whistleblowing management, asset management and policy management alongside the privacy modules.

What pricing or buyer-review signal is available for Enactia?

Does Enactia support GDPR Article 30 RoPA?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents RoPA / Article 30. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.

Does Enactia support DPIA or privacy assessments?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents DPIA/PIA assessments. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.

Does Enactia support DSAR or privacy rights workflows?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents DSAR / privacy rights. Acompli is marked as not publicly confirmed for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.

Does Enactia provide data mapping?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents Data mapping. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.

Does Enactia provide vendor risk or third-party privacy risk management?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents Vendor risk. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.

Does Enactia provide consent management or cookie scanning?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents Consent management. Not publicly confirmed. Enactia is marked N for Cookie/tracker scanning here, meaning public documentation does not clearly confirm it, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as not publicly confirmed for consent management and not publicly confirmed for cookie/tracker scanning, so buyers needing either capability should verify live vendor scope before procurement.

Does Enactia provide AI governance?

Yes. Enactia publicly documents AI governance. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.

How should buyers read the Enactia vs Acompli capability table?

The table records public-documentation signals for each supplier. "Y" means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented; "N" means it was not publicly confirmed, not proof that the supplier cannot provide it.

What are Enactia alternatives?

Enactia alternatives depend on the buyer's exact requirement, because Enactia's strongest fit is: Choose Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. The shortlist may include broad privacy platforms, GRC tools, specialist consent or DSAR tools, service providers, and Acompli where the buyer needs overlapping privacy-governance workflows shown in the table.

How does Enactia compare with Acompli?

Enactia should be assessed first on its own published fit: Choose Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. Acompli is included as a factual overlap point where the requirement is: Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. Buyers should ask both suppliers to demonstrate the same workflow with current product screens, exports and implementation assumptions.

When should buyers shortlist Enactia?

Buyers should shortlist Enactia when broad multi-framework GRC, security-compliance cross-mapping, incident and whistleblowing handling match the programme you want to run. They should only compare Acompli for the overlapping requirements shown on this page, and they should keep any specialist supplier that covers a requirement neither platform clearly evidences.

How current is this Enactia profile?

Ratings, pricing, product names, plan limits and service scope can change over time. Treat this as a comparison guide and verify current details with Enactia before procurement.

Acompli answers

Acompli as a Enactia alternative

Who are Enactia's competitors?

Enactia's main competitors in privacy and GRC management include OneTrust, TrustArc, Vanta, Drata and other multi-framework GRC platforms, alongside privacy-native tools. Acompli competes as a focused, privacy-native alternative for Ireland, UK and EU teams that want connected, evidence-traceable RoPA, DPIA, risk, vendor and AI-governance records with human approval, rather than a broad multi-framework GRC suite.

Is Acompli a good Enactia alternative?

Acompli is a strong Enactia alternative when the priority is a defensible, assessment-fed privacy record rather than breadth of frameworks. RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records are connected, confidence-scored, human-approved and exportable for the DPC or ICO. Enactia remains the better fit if you specifically need multi-framework security-GRC cross-mapping across ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA and NIS2, or its packaged breach and whistleblowing modules.

Does Acompli replace Enactia?

Acompli can replace Enactia for the core privacy-operations workflows - RoPA, DPIA, privacy risk, vendor records, data mapping and EU AI Act governance - for many teams. It does not replace Enactia's broader security-GRC scope, such as ISO 27001/SOC 2 cross-mapping, incident/breach management or whistleblowing; teams that rely on those keep them alongside Acompli or stay with Enactia.

How do Enactia and Acompli differ?

Enactia is a broad, AI-assisted, multi-framework GRC suite - privacy management plus security-compliance cross-mapping (ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, DORA, NIS2, Gulf PDPL), incident/breach and whistleblowing - registered in Cyprus with global offices. Acompli is narrower and deeper on governed privacy records: assessment-fed Article 30 records, data mapping, AI-Act governance and code-scan evidence, each traceable to its source and human-approved, built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO.

Does Enactia publish pricing, and does Acompli?

Enactia does not publish a standard list price. Pricing is demo-led and quoted on employee count (tiers commonly cited from Startups up to Enterprise, plus on-premise), with a free trial that requires no card; third-party listings reference figures from around USD 450 upward. Acompli also prices on its compliance estate — data controllers, legal entities, jurisdictions and integrations — never per seat, and provides pricing on request rather than a public list price, because the effort scales with the programme rather than the number of logins.

What is the best Enactia alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams?

The best Enactia alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams is one built around GDPR Article 30 coverage, DPC and ICO fit, and a self-contained per-entity export. Acompli is built around exactly those - both Article 30(1) and 30(2) records, EU and UK GDPR distinguished on one register, and an export the DPC or ICO can read without a platform login - the provenance wedge a broad, framework-mapping GRC suite does not foreground.

Does Enactia have an EU AI Act or AI governance module?

Yes - Enactia offers an AI governance capability aligned to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act, including an AI model registry (mapping each model, its version history, training-data sources and intended use), AI impact assessment and AI transparency logging. Acompli's AI governance module similarly supports EU AI Act risk classification, assessment-driven AI-system records and human approval of each AI-system entry, with the record traceable to its evidence source. Both serve AI governance; the difference is Acompli's provenance and per-entity export wedge rather than the presence of an AI register itself.

Is Enactia a full security-GRC platform or a privacy tool?

Enactia is a broad GRC platform rather than a privacy-only tool: alongside RoPA, DPIA and DSAR it cross-maps security frameworks (ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, DORA, NIS2) and adds incident/breach management, whistleblowing management, asset management and policy management. Acompli is privacy-native and focuses on connected, human-approved privacy records with evidence provenance; teams needing full security-GRC cross-mapping would keep Enactia or a dedicated security-compliance tool alongside Acompli.

Does Enactia handle data breaches and incidents?

Yes - Enactia packages incident and data-breach management with an incident register, which is one of its genuine strengths and part of why it suits combined privacy-and-security teams. Acompli does not package breach/incident management; it focuses on connected RoPA, DPIA, risk, vendor and AI-governance records. Teams that need a packaged breach module would keep Enactia or a dedicated incident tool alongside Acompli's governed records.

Where is Enactia based, and why might that matter?

Enactia is registered in Nicosia, Cyprus, with offices in London, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh, and holds ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 Type II attestation - useful signals for security-conscious buyers and for organisations with Gulf PDPL obligations. Acompli serves Irish, UK and EU teams with a focus on DPC and ICO fit and a self-contained per-entity export. Teams whose deciding factor is multi-region, multi-framework GRC breadth may prefer Enactia; teams whose deciding factor is evidence provenance and a defensible Article 30 record may prefer Acompli.

Acompli overlap

Related Acompli workflows

Assessments

Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.

Open module

RoPA management

Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.

Open module

Risk management

Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.

Open module

Compare Enactia and Acompli against a real workflow.

Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Enactia, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.

Book a walkthrough See a sample Evidence Pack

Acompli architecture

One governed foundation. Five connected modules.

Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.

Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.