Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Data Privacy Manager vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Data Privacy Manager is profiled first using its public positioning: EU-based privacy-automation platform spanning data discovery, RoPA, consent, DSR, third-party, risk, incident and data removal. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
Key takeaways
- Data Privacy Manager public market lane: EU-based privacy-automation platform spanning data discovery, RoPA, consent, DSR, third-party, risk, incident and data removal.
- Data Privacy Manager best-fit buyer: EU and international organisations that want a broad, EU-based privacy-automation programme connecting personal-data systems - with AI-assisted data discovery, consent and preference management, DSR automation, third-party management, incident handling and automated data removal.
- Data Privacy Manager published strengths include consent and preference management as a packaged module - a single, structured repository of consents across marketing, CRM, web and communication channels with lifecycle logging and expiry alerts - where Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Data Privacy Manager profile
What Data Privacy Manager provides
Data Privacy Manager (Zagreb, Croatia) is a cloud-based privacy-automation platform now operating under the Legit brand after spinning out from Poslovna inteligencija. It positions itself as an EU-based RegTech that connects to the systems holding personal data and automates privacy tasks - data discovery, RoPA, consent and preference management, data subject requests, third-party management, risk and incident management, and data removal - and holds ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001 certification, with recognition on the RegTech100 2026 list and in Gartner and Forrester coverage.
Data Privacy Manager does not publish list prices. Its pricing page describes a custom, annual-subscription model with modular licensing configured on scope of systems and data sources, selected modules, deployment (cloud or on-premises) and organisational complexity (number of entities and jurisdictions), and directs buyers to 'Talk to Sales' or 'Request a Demo'. Reporting elsewhere describes tiered plans keyed to the number of managed data subjects, selected features and user seats.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | EU-based privacy-automation platform spanning data discovery, RoPA, consent, DSR, third-party, risk, incident and data removal. |
| Best-fit buyer | EU and international organisations that want a broad, EU-based privacy-automation programme connecting personal-data systems - with AI-assisted data discovery, consent and preference management, DSR automation, third-party management, incident handling and automated data removal. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | Croatian (Zagreb) vendor, now branded Legit, with ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001 certification and RegTech100 2026 recognition. Pricing is demo-led with no public list prices; the model is a custom annual subscription configured on systems, modules, deployment and organisational complexity. Third-party review coverage on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights is currently thin. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS privacy-automation platform (on-premises deployment referenced for some buyers), connecting to source systems that hold personal data; modular suite covering data discovery, RoPA, assessments, consent, DSR, third-party, risk, incident management and data removal. |
02Official website signals
What Data Privacy Manager emphasises on its own website
Data Privacy Manager positions itself as privacy-management software for personal-data governance and privacy automation.
- Official solution pages list data processing inventory, assessment automation, third-party management, risk, incident, consent and data subject request workflows.
- The public lane also includes data discovery and personal-data search signals.
- Data Privacy Manager is best treated as a broad privacy-management comparator where consent and discovery may matter to the buyer.
- Consent and preference management as a packaged module - a single, structured repository of consents across marketing, CRM, web and communication channels with lifecycle logging and expiry alerts - where Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- Incident management as a packaged module for documenting, categorising and tracking privacy incidents - Acompli does not offer breach/incident management.
- Automated data removal and retention orchestration, including real-time retention and destruction schedules that instruct connected systems to delete data, with a filerskeepers retention-schedule integration.
- AI-assisted personal-data discovery and classification across connected systems, backed by ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001 certification and RegTech100 2026 recognition - Acompli prices on scope and does not list public prices.
05At a glance
Data Privacy Manager vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Data Privacy Manager first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Data Privacy Manager | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want an established, EU-based privacy-automation suite with data discovery, consent, DSR, third-party, incident and data-removal modules. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | A broad EU-based privacy-automation platform spanning data discovery, RoPA, consent, DSR, third-party, risk, incident management and data removal. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Data Privacy Manager when consent management, AI-assisted data discovery, incident handling and automated data removal across connected systems match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
06Capability comparison
Data Privacy Manager product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Data Privacy Manager | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | N | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | N | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | N | N |
| Training module | N | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
07Ireland & UK
Data Privacy Manager vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Data Privacy Manager is built for the EU market from Croatia, while Acompli is built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Data Privacy Manager and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
08Shortlisting notes
When Data Privacy Manager belongs on the shortlist
Data Privacy Manager should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Data Privacy Manager when consent management, AI-assisted data discovery, incident handling and automated data removal across connected systems match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Data Privacy Manager questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Data Privacy Manager alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Data Privacy Manager and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Data Privacy Manager, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.