Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Dastra vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Dastra is profiled first using its public positioning: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
Key takeaways
- Dastra public market lane: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams.
- Dastra best-fit buyer: EU organisations and external DPOs wanting a broad, didactic GDPR programme (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, consent, cookies, breach, vendor, AI systems, training) with strong French/CNIL alignment.
- Dastra published strengths include consent and cookie compliance through a built-in CMP with a cookie scanner that identifies the cookies on a site - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies.
- The capability rows are evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, and "N" means not clearly evidenced here.
Comparison workflow
From company profile to shortlist decision
01Dastra profile
What Dastra provides
Dastra (Paris, France; founded 2020) positions itself as an all-in-one data privacy and governance platform for the GDPR, e-Privacy and EU AI Act, with a product designed and developed in Europe and certifications including ISO 27001 and ISO 27701. One co-founder is a former CNIL jurist, and the platform is closely aligned to CNIL guidance and French regulatory practice.
Pricing signal reviewed on 30 June 2026: Dastra publishes three tiers by name - Starter ('build solid privacy foundations'), Pro ('orchestrate data compliance as a team', marked most popular) and Enterprise ('unify privacy, governance and compliance risks') - plus public-service and external-DPO partnership offers and a la carte options. No public price figures, free plan or free trial are listed; pricing is by demo/quote. Buyers should verify current scope, modules, limits, implementation costs and contract terms directly with Dastra.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams. |
| Best-fit buyer | EU organisations and external DPOs wanting a broad, didactic GDPR programme (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, consent, cookies, breach, vendor, AI systems, training) with strong French/CNIL alignment. |
| Review / pricing signal | French (Paris) vendor; ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 certified, IAPP member. Appvizer lists a 4.6 rating (22 reviews); Capterra and G2 list the product but with few or no reviews. Pricing is contact-sales (Starter / Pro / Enterprise) with no public figures, free plan or trial. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS privacy and governance platform; the suite spans Privacy, AI, Cyber and Cookies offerings, plus a cookie-consent CMP (with a WordPress plugin) and an integrated Dastra Academy training environment. |
02Official website signals
What Dastra emphasises on its own website
Dastra positions itself as a European data privacy and governance platform for GDPR, e-Privacy and EU AI Act workflows. Official source reviewed on 30 June 2026.
- Official pages emphasise RoPA, privacy rights, assessments, third-party work, consent and cookie compliance, breach workflows and AI-governance coverage.
- Dastra's public positioning is French and CNIL-fluent, with European hosting, certifications and privacy training signals.
- Dastra is best compared as a broad EU privacy suite where consent, cookies and training sit alongside core privacy records.
03Published strengths
Dastra products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Dastra is an established, genuinely broad GDPR suite with deep CNIL fluency, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- Consent and cookie compliance through a built-in CMP with a cookie scanner that identifies the cookies on a site - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies.
- An integrated training academy (filmed courses, monthly live sessions, quizzes and certificates) built into the platform - Acompli has no training module.
- Breach and incident management as a packaged module, plus a contract and policy register and document generation.
- Deep CNIL alignment, a French-language and 90-language interface, 300+ pre-built record models, and Excel/CSV import with PDF/Excel/CSV/Word/JSON/Markdown and Article 30 export - a broad, mature operating surface. Pricing is on request rather than public, the same model as Acompli.
04Comparison context
Dastra alternatives
Dastra is publicly positioned in this market lane: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams.
This page profiles Dastra's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, review and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
The comparison is evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, while "N" means not clearly evidenced here rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
05At a glance
Dastra vs Acompli at a glance
Published by Acompli and last reviewed on 30 June 2026. This page profiles Dastra first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Dastra | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want an established all-in-one GDPR platform with consent, cookie scanning, training and strong French/CNIL alignment. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | An all-in-one EU data privacy suite spanning RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, vendor, risk, breach, retention, consent, cookies, AI systems and training. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
06Capability comparison
Dastra product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in public sources reviewed for this comparison.
| Capability | Dastra | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | Y |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | Y | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | Y | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
07Ireland & UK
Dastra vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Both platforms are European and built for GDPR, but their regulatory centre of gravity differs: Dastra is French-rooted and CNIL-fluent, while Acompli is anchored to the Irish DPC and the UK ICO. For an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record and how cleanly it exports for your own authority. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Dastra and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
08Shortlisting notes
When Dastra belongs on the shortlist
Dastra should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Dastra questions answered
What is Dastra?
Dastra is profiled here in this market lane: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams. Dastra (Paris, France; founded 2020) positions itself as an all-in-one data privacy and governance platform for the GDPR, e-Privacy and EU AI Act, with a product designed and developed in Europe and certifications including ISO 27001 and ISO 27701. One co-founder is a former CNIL jurist, and the platform is closely aligned to CNIL guidance and French regulatory practice.
What does Dastra provide?
Dastra provides the products, services or modules publicly evidenced in the capability table on this page. The table covers RoPA, DPIA/PIA assessments, DSAR/privacy rights, data mapping, vendor risk, privacy risk, AI governance, consent, cookie scanning, breach, retention, policy, training, workflow, audit and export signals.
Who is Dastra best suited for?
Dastra is best suited for EU organisations and external DPOs wanting a broad, didactic GDPR programme (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, consent, cookies, breach, vendor, AI systems, training) with strong French/CNIL alignment. Buyers should still verify current product scope, service scope, contract terms and implementation requirements directly with Dastra.
What are Dastra's main product or service strengths?
Dastra's published strengths include Consent and cookie compliance through a built-in CMP with a cookie scanner that identifies the cookies on a site - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies; An integrated training academy (filmed courses, monthly live sessions, quizzes and certificates) built into the platform - Acompli has no training module; Breach and incident management as a packaged module, plus a contract and policy register and document generation.
What is Dastra's pricing or review signal?
Dastra's pricing or review signal in this profile is: Dastra (Paris, France; founded 2020) positions itself as an all-in-one data privacy and governance platform for the GDPR, e-Privacy and EU AI Act, with a product designed and developed in Europe and certifications including ISO 27001 and ISO 27701. One co-founder is a former CNIL jurist, and the platform is closely aligned to CNIL guidance and French regulatory practice. This page was last reviewed on 30 June 2026, and buyers should verify current pricing, ratings, plan limits, implementation fees and service scope directly with Dastra.
Does Dastra support GDPR Article 30 RoPA?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for RoPA / Article 30 in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Dastra support DPIA or privacy assessments?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for DPIA/PIA assessments in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Dastra support DSAR or privacy rights workflows?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for DSAR / privacy rights in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Dastra provide data mapping?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for Data mapping in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Dastra provide vendor risk or third-party privacy risk management?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for Vendor risk in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Dastra provide consent management or cookie scanning?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for Consent management in the reviewed source set. Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for Cookie/tracker scanning in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as not clearly evidenced for consent management and not clearly evidenced for cookie/tracker scanning, so buyers needing either capability should verify live vendor scope before procurement.
Does Dastra provide AI governance?
Yes. Dastra is marked as publicly evidenced for AI governance in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
How should buyers read the Dastra vs Acompli capability table?
The table records public evidence found for each supplier. "Y" means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in reviewed public sources; "N" means it was not clearly evidenced here, not proof that the supplier cannot provide it.
What are Dastra alternatives?
Dastra alternatives depend on the buyer's exact requirement, because Dastra's strongest fit is: Choose Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run. The shortlist may include broad privacy platforms, GRC tools, specialist consent or DSAR tools, service providers, and Acompli where the buyer needs overlapping privacy-governance workflows shown in the table.
How does Dastra compare with Acompli?
Dastra should be assessed first on its own published fit: Choose Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run. Acompli is included as a factual overlap point where the requirement is: Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers, DSARs and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. Buyers should ask both suppliers to demonstrate the same workflow with current product screens, exports and implementation assumptions.
When should buyers shortlist Dastra?
Buyers should shortlist Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run. They should only compare Acompli for the overlapping requirements shown on this page, and they should keep any specialist supplier that covers a requirement neither platform clearly evidences.
How current is this Dastra profile?
This profile was last reviewed on 30 June 2026. Ratings, pricing, product names, plan limits and service scope can change, so buyers should treat this as a comparison guide and verify current details with Dastra before procurement.
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Dastra alternative
Who are Dastra's competitors?
Dastra's main competitors in privacy management include OneTrust, TrustArc and Didomi, alongside other GDPR and compliance platforms. Acompli competes as a focused, privacy-native alternative for Ireland, UK and EU teams that want connected, evidence-traceable RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendor and AI-governance records with human approval, rather than a broad all-in-one suite with consent and training.
Is Acompli a good Dastra alternative?
Acompli is a strong Dastra alternative when the priority is a defensible, assessment-fed record rather than breadth of modules. RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records are connected, confidence-scored, human-approved and exportable for the Irish DPC or UK ICO. Dastra remains the better fit if you specifically need a cookie-consent CMP, cookie scanning, an integrated training academy or its deep CNIL fluency.
Does Acompli replace Dastra?
Acompli can replace Dastra for the core privacy-operations workflows - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, privacy risk, vendor records, data mapping and EU AI Act governance - for many teams. It does not replace Dastra's cookie-consent CMP, its cookie scanner or its integrated training academy; teams that rely on those keep them alongside Acompli.
How do Dastra and Acompli differ?
Dastra is a broad, French-rooted, CNIL-fluent all-in-one suite - privacy management plus consent, cookie scanning, breach, an AI-systems register, a policy register and a training academy. Acompli is narrower and deeper on governed records: assessment-fed Article 30 records, data mapping, AI-Act governance and code-scan evidence, each traceable to its source, human-approved, and exportable per legal entity for the Irish DPC or UK ICO.
Does Dastra publish pricing, and does Acompli?
Dastra publishes plan names - Starter, Pro and Enterprise, plus public-service and external-DPO offers - but does not list public price figures, a free plan or a free trial; pricing is by demo or quote. Acompli also prices on scope (legal entities, jurisdictions, users and integrations) and provides pricing on request rather than a public list price, because the effort scales with the programme rather than the number of logins.
What is the best Dastra alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams?
The best Dastra alternative for Irish and UK privacy teams is one built around GDPR Article 30 coverage, DPC and ICO fit, and a self-contained per-entity export. Acompli is built around exactly those - both Article 30(1) and 30(2) records, EU and UK GDPR distinguished on one register, and an export the DPC or ICO can read without a platform login. Dastra is French-rooted and CNIL-fluent, so teams whose regulatory centre of gravity is Ireland or the UK often prefer Acompli's anchoring.
Does Dastra have an EU AI Act module?
Yes - Dastra includes a genuine AI-systems register that classifies systems by EU AI Act risk level (minimal, limited, high and unacceptable), runs risk analysis, links AI systems to the data-processing record, and exports systems, audits and compliance evidence. It also references broader frameworks such as ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF. Acompli's AI governance module covers the same EU AI Act risk-classification and assessment-driven AI-system records, with the difference being provenance - each AI-system entry is human-approved and traces back to its evidence source - plus code-scan evidence for software in scope.
Does Dastra include consent and cookie management?
Yes - Dastra ships a cookie-consent CMP with a cookie scanner that identifies the cookies on a site, a customisable consent widget (with a WordPress plugin and Google Tag Manager integration), and consent-proof storage and export. Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies, so a team that needs a CMP would keep Dastra's consent module or a dedicated CMP alongside Acompli.
Is Dastra suitable for multi-entity groups and external DPOs?
Dastra supports dividing a register by entity, department and person and lets external DPOs manage multiple clients from one place, with a dedicated external-DPO partnership offer - so it serves groups and consultancies well. Acompli's multi-entity model adds a self-contained per-entity export for each supervisory authority, so for corporate groups with distinct controller/processor records per subsidiary - each answering its own DPC or ICO - Acompli's per-entity export may be a closer structural fit.
How do Dastra and Acompli handle import and export?
Both are strong here. Dastra imports in bulk from Excel and CSV and exports in PDF, Excel, CSV, Word, JSON and Markdown, including an Article 30 format. Acompli also supports spreadsheet import and PDF/CSV/Excel export, and adds a self-contained per-entity export the Irish DPC or UK ICO can read without a platform login. The practical difference is less the formats and more the provenance: in Acompli each exported field traces back to the approved assessment that produced it.
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleDSAR management
Manage requests from intake to archive with deadlines, identity checks, redaction and audit history.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Dastra and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Dastra, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.