Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Dastra vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Dastra is profiled first using its public positioning: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Dastra alternativeRoPADPIAEvidence
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
On this page
Key takeaways
- Dastra public market lane: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams.
- Dastra best-fit buyer: EU organisations and external DPOs wanting a broad, didactic GDPR programme (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, consent, cookies, breach, vendor, AI systems, training) with strong French/CNIL alignment.
- Dastra published strengths include consent and cookie compliance through a built-in CMP with a cookie scanner that identifies the cookies on a site - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Dastra profile
What Dastra provides
Dastra (Paris, France; founded 2020) positions itself as an all-in-one data privacy and governance platform for the GDPR, e-Privacy and EU AI Act, with a product designed and developed in Europe and certifications including ISO 27001 and ISO 27701. One co-founder is a former CNIL jurist, and the platform is closely aligned to CNIL guidance and French regulatory practice.
Dastra publishes three tiers by name - Starter ('build solid privacy foundations'), Pro ('orchestrate data compliance as a team', marked most popular) and Enterprise ('unify privacy, governance and compliance risks') - plus public-service and external-DPO partnership offers and a la carte options. No public price figures, free plan or free trial are listed; pricing is by demo/quote.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams. |
| Best-fit buyer | EU organisations and external DPOs wanting a broad, didactic GDPR programme (RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, consent, cookies, breach, vendor, AI systems, training) with strong French/CNIL alignment. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | French (Paris) vendor; ISO 27001 and ISO 27701 certified, IAPP member. Appvizer lists a 4.6 rating (22 reviews); Capterra and G2 list the product but with few or no reviews. Pricing is contact-sales (Starter / Pro / Enterprise) with no public figures, free plan or trial. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS privacy and governance platform; the suite spans Privacy, AI, Cyber and Cookies offerings, plus a cookie-consent CMP (with a WordPress plugin) and an integrated Dastra Academy training environment. |
02Official website signals
What Dastra emphasises on its own website
Dastra positions itself as a European data privacy and governance platform for GDPR, e-Privacy and EU AI Act workflows.
- Official pages emphasise RoPA, privacy rights, assessments, third-party work, consent and cookie compliance, breach workflows and AI-governance coverage.
- Dastra's public positioning is French and CNIL-fluent, with European hosting, certifications and privacy training signals.
- Dastra is best compared as a broad EU privacy suite where consent, cookies and training sit alongside core privacy records.
03Published strengths
Dastra products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Dastra is an established, genuinely broad GDPR suite with deep CNIL fluency, and for some buyers it is the better choice.
- Consent and cookie compliance through a built-in CMP with a cookie scanner that identifies the cookies on a site - Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies.
- An integrated training academy (filmed courses, monthly live sessions, quizzes and certificates) built into the platform - Acompli has no training module.
- Breach and incident management as a packaged module, plus a contract and policy register and document generation.
- Deep CNIL alignment, a French-language and 90-language interface, 300+ pre-built record models, and Excel/CSV import with PDF/Excel/CSV/Word/JSON/Markdown and Article 30 export - a broad, mature operating surface. Pricing is on request rather than public, the same model as Acompli.
04Sourced 2025-2026 signals
What's new at Dastra (2025-2026, sourced)
These sourced updates were researched on 2026-07-05 and are listed separately from the live comparison table so existing profile claims remain unchanged.
Dastra raised €4.3 million in a round led by C4 Ventures and ADNEXUS (announced 27 May 2025), stated to accelerate European expansion and build an AI agent intended to perform compliance tasks autonomously for DPOs; the same announcement states the platform is used by "over 5,000 organizations" and names SNCF, France Télévisions and MAIF as customers (vendor's own claim, not independently audited).
Dastra shipped a "Dastra 2.0" platform update (27 Jan 2026) adding a new project-based "Compliance" module that lets teams import standard templates (GDPR, AI Act cited as examples), run controls/tests, and reuse the same controls across multiple regulatory standards within one project rather than treating each as a separate audit — a multi-framework capability not reflected in the existing profile's GDPR/e-Privacy/AI-Act framing.
Dastra version 2.0.3 (11 May 2026), added vendor-described AI-assisted features: automatic generation of AI-system model sheets from a description or model name, an "AI analysis" function that assesses whether submitted compliance evidence meets test expectations, a workflow-rule template library, and conditional (skip-)logic questionnaire forms — none of these are mentioned in the existing profile.
Dastra's own site now displays a CyberVadis cybersecurity rating (Gold grade, score 908/1000, scorecard covering March 2025–February 2026) and specifies "IAPP Bronze" membership, alongside the ISO 27001/ISO 27701 badges already noted in the existing profile — the CyberVadis certification is not currently listed.
Dastra publishes a dedicated solution page for the UK, stating it helps organisations comply with "the UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Data Use and Access Act (DUAA)," including UK Freedom-of-Information (FOI) request handling and reducing "fines from the ICO" — indicating more developed UK-specific messaging than the existing profile's purely "French-rooted/CNIL-fluent" framing suggests, even though Dastra's core regulatory identity remains French/CNIL-centred.
Dastra's homepage now advertises compliance coverage extending to "GDPR, AI Act, NIS2, DORA," and Dastra publishes a DORA-specific third-party-contract audit questionnaire template, broadening its stated regulatory scope beyond the GDPR/e-Privacy/EU AI Act framing in the existing profile (this is vendor messaging; the depth of NIS2/DORA feature support beyond audit templates and blog content was not independently verified in this pass).
Dastra holds a 4-star rating from 28 reviews on Trustpilot, an independent review site not covered in the existing profile; Capterra continues to show no reviews for Dastra as of 2026, consistent with the existing profile's "Capterra and G2 list the product but with few or no reviews" note.
05Comparison context
Dastra alternatives
Dastra is publicly positioned in this market lane: All-in-one EU (French-rooted, CNIL-fluent) data privacy and governance platform for DPOs and compliance teams.
This page profiles Dastra's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, rating and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
"Y" means publicly documented, while "N" means not publicly confirmed rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
06At a glance
Dastra vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Dastra first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Dastra | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want an established all-in-one GDPR platform with consent, cookie scanning, training and strong French/CNIL alignment. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | An all-in-one EU data privacy suite spanning RoPA, DSAR, DPIA, vendor, risk, breach, retention, consent, cookies, AI systems and training. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
07Capability comparison
Dastra product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Dastra | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | Y | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | Y | N |
| Breach/incident management | Y | N |
| Retention management | Y | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | Y | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | Y | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
08Ireland & UK
Dastra vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Both platforms are European and built for GDPR, but their regulatory centre of gravity differs: Dastra is French-rooted and CNIL-fluent, while Acompli is anchored to the Irish DPC and the UK ICO. For an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record and how cleanly it exports for your own authority. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Dastra and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
09Shortlisting notes
When Dastra belongs on the shortlist
Dastra should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Dastra when its broad modular suite, cookie-consent CMP, integrated training and CNIL fluency match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Dastra questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Dastra alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Dastra and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Dastra, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.