Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Credo AI vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Credo AI is profiled first using its public positioning: US enterprise AI-governance, risk and compliance platform for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Credo AI alternativeAI governanceEU AI ActNIST AI RMFISO 42001
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
On this page
Key takeaways
- Credo AI public market lane: US enterprise AI-governance, risk and compliance platform for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
- Credo AI best-fit buyer: Large enterprises and regulated organisations (financial services, healthcare, public sector) running in-house AI/ML and agent estates that need model-level discovery, testing, policy conformity and audit-ready evidence across AI frameworks.
- Credo AI published strengths include purpose-built AI registry and discovery - inventory of AI systems, agents, models and shadow AI, with a dependency graph across agents, models, tools and data and auto-discovery across cloud environments. Acompli keeps an AI-system register but does not do model-level auto-discovery.
- The capability rows are evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, and "N" means not clearly evidenced here.
Comparison workflow
From company profile to shortlist decision
01Credo AI profileWhat Credo AI provides02Official website signalsWhat Credo AI emphasises on its own website03Published strengthsCredo AI products, services and stated strengths04Comparison contextCredo AI alternatives05At a glanceCredo AI vs Acompli at a glance06Capability comparisonCredo AI product and service coverage compared with Acompli07Ireland & UKCredo AI vs Acompli for AI governance in Ireland and the UK
Market lanechecked
Best-fit buyerchecked
Public strengthschecked
Capability evidencechecked
Overlapchecked
Gapschecked
Exportschecked
Shortlist fitchecked
01Credo AI profile
What Credo AI provides
Credo AI (Palo Alto, California; founded 2020 by Navrina Singh) is an enterprise platform purpose-built for AI governance, risk and compliance. Its stated aim is to let enterprises trust their AI and prove it: discover and inventory AI systems, agents and shadow AI; run continuous risk assessment; apply pre-built regulatory policy packs; and generate audit-ready evidence. It maps to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, SOC 2 and US-specific rules (for example Colorado SB21-169 and NYC Local Law 144), and integrates with cloud, MLOps and GRC tooling such as AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks, Snowflake, ServiceNow and OneTrust. Named customers include Mastercard, Autodesk, Booz Allen Hamilton and US federal programmes, and Credo AI was named a Leader in The Forrester Wave AI Governance Solutions, Q3 2025, and recognised in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms.
Pricing signal reviewed on 1 July 2026: Credo AI does not publish list pricing. It is demo-led and quoted per organisation; independent write-ups estimate roughly USD 30,000 to USD 150,000+ per year, with total first-year cost (implementation and professional services included) often reaching USD 40,000 to USD 200,000+. The platform is aimed at organisations with in-house data-science and ML infrastructure. Buyers should confirm current scope, plan structure, self-hosting options and contract terms directly with Credo AI.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | US enterprise AI-governance, risk and compliance platform for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. |
| Best-fit buyer | Large enterprises and regulated organisations (financial services, healthcare, public sector) running in-house AI/ML and agent estates that need model-level discovery, testing, policy conformity and audit-ready evidence across AI frameworks. |
| Review / pricing signal | US (Palo Alto) vendor; rated around 4.2 out of 5 on Gartner Peer Insights and recognised by Forrester and Gartner as an AI-governance leader. No public list pricing - demo-led, quoted per organisation; third-party estimates put it in the USD 30k to USD 150k+/year range. |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS AI-governance platform (with a documented self-hosted option); AI registry, risk intelligence, policy engine, runtime/agent governance and governance AI agents (GAIA), integrated with cloud, MLOps and GRC tooling. Multiple organisations and business units are not supported on a single instance per Credo AI's self-hosted documentation. |
02Official website signals
What Credo AI emphasises on its own website
Credo AI positions itself as an enterprise AI governance, risk and compliance platform. Official source reviewed on 30 June 2026.
- Official pages emphasise an AI registry, policies, risk workflows, compliance evidence and regulatory alignment.
- The public lane includes AI governance proof for frameworks and regulations such as the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
- Credo AI is strongest where AI governance is the primary programme rather than a module inside a privacy platform.
03Published strengths
Credo AI products, services and stated strengths
A fair comparison names what the other platform does well. Credo AI is a category leader in dedicated enterprise AI governance, and for organisations governing a large AI/ML estate with model-level discovery, testing and framework conformity it is the stronger tool by design - specialist AI-specific work Acompli does not attempt. Acompli is itself a first-class EU AI Act governance platform; where it differs is that its AI Act compliance is connected, human-approved and provenance-based, built for Irish, UK and EU privacy teams.
- Purpose-built AI registry and discovery - inventory of AI systems, agents, models and shadow AI, with a dependency graph across agents, models, tools and data and auto-discovery across cloud environments. Acompli keeps an AI-system register but does not do model-level auto-discovery.
- Continuous, AI-specific risk intelligence - an agentic risk-assessment library, automated red-teaming, drift detection and continuous evaluation of agent traces, well beyond a privacy-ops AI register.
- Pre-built regulatory policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2, with automated evidence generation and governance AI agents (GAIA) that retrieve evidence, draft governance plans and propose remediation while keeping humans in the loop.
- Deep enterprise ecosystem - documented integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks, Snowflake, MLflow, ServiceNow, Archer, OneTrust and agent frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen), plus a self-hosting option for regulated buyers.
04Comparison context
Credo AI alternatives
Credo AI is publicly positioned in this market lane: US enterprise AI-governance, risk and compliance platform for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001.
This page profiles Credo AI's stated product and service coverage, best-fit buyer, review and pricing signals, and published strengths before comparing where Acompli overlaps.
The comparison is evidence-framed: "Y" means publicly evidenced in the reviewed source set, while "N" means not clearly evidenced here rather than proof that a supplier cannot provide it.
05At a glance
Credo AI vs Acompli at a glance
Published by Acompli and last reviewed on 30 June 2026. This page profiles Credo AI first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Credo AI | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprise AI, ML and data-science programmes that need to discover, inventory, test and govern AI systems and agents against the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. | Irish, UK and EU privacy teams that need first-class EU AI Act governance - an AI-system register, risk classification and conformity workflow - connected to their RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records and built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO. |
| Operating model | AI-governance, risk and compliance platform: AI registry and discovery, continuous risk intelligence, policy packs, evidence generation and runtime/agent governance. | EU AI Act governance and compliance platform: AI-system register, EU AI Act risk classification and conformity/assessment workflow with human-approved, provenance-based AI records - connected to assessment-fed RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records. |
| When to choose it | Choose Credo AI when the main problem is governing a large estate of AI models and agents against AI-specific frameworks, with model-level discovery, testing and conformity. | Choose Acompli when the priority is connected, human-approved, provenance-based EU AI Act compliance - AI-system records, risk classification and conformity - sitting inside a defensible privacy programme (RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, suppliers) for the Irish DPC and UK ICO. |
06Capability comparison
Credo AI product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in public sources reviewed for this comparison.
| Capability | Credo AI | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | N | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | N | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | N | Y |
| Data mapping | N | Y |
| Vendor risk | Y | Y |
| Privacy risk | N | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | N | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | N | N |
| Breach/incident management | N | N |
| Retention management | N | Y |
| Policy/notice management | Y | N |
| Training module | N | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | N | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | N | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | N | Y |
| Public pricing | N | N |
07Ireland & UK
Credo AI vs Acompli for AI governance in Ireland and the UK
For an Irish or UK organisation the deciding question is how EU AI Act governance connects to the rest of the compliance programme. Both platforms cover the EU AI Act: Credo AI governs AI systems against AI frameworks - EU AI Act risk classification and conformity assessments, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 - which is the right layer for a large AI/ML estate. Acompli delivers EU AI Act governance as a core pillar built into the privacy programme, so each AI system is risk-classified, assessed and connected to the GDPR Article 30 record and the DPIA that assessed it. Records of processing are required under Article 30 (a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2)), and the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Credo AI and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
08Shortlisting notes
When Credo AI belongs on the shortlist
Credo AI should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Credo AI when the main problem is governing a large estate of AI models and agents against AI-specific frameworks, with model-level discovery, testing and conformity.
- Shortlist Acompli when the priority is connected, human-approved, provenance-based EU AI Act compliance - AI-system records, risk classification and conformity - sitting inside a defensible privacy programme (RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, suppliers) for the Irish DPC and UK ICO.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Credo AI questions answered
What is Credo AI?
Credo AI is profiled here in this market lane: US enterprise AI-governance, risk and compliance platform for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001. Credo AI (Palo Alto, California; founded 2020 by Navrina Singh) is an enterprise platform purpose-built for AI governance, risk and compliance. Its stated aim is to let enterprises trust their AI and prove it: discover and inventory AI systems, agents and shadow AI; run continuous risk assessment; apply pre-built regulatory policy packs; and generate audit-ready evidence. It maps to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, SOC 2 and US-specific rules (for example Colorado SB21-169 and NYC Local Law 144), and integrates with cloud, MLOps and GRC tooling such as AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks, Snowflake, ServiceNow and OneTrust. Named customers include Mastercard, Autodesk, Booz Allen Hamilton and US federal programmes, and Credo AI was named a Leader in The Forrester Wave AI Governance Solutions, Q3 2025, and recognised in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms.
What does Credo AI provide?
Credo AI provides the products, services or modules publicly evidenced in the capability table on this page. The table covers RoPA, DPIA/PIA assessments, DSAR/privacy rights, data mapping, vendor risk, privacy risk, AI governance, consent, cookie scanning, breach, retention, policy, training, workflow, audit and export signals.
Who is Credo AI best suited for?
Credo AI is best suited for large enterprises and regulated organisations (financial services, healthcare, public sector) running in-house AI/ML and agent estates that need model-level discovery, testing, policy conformity and audit-ready evidence across AI frameworks. Buyers should still verify current product scope, service scope, contract terms and implementation requirements directly with Credo AI.
What are Credo AI's main product or service strengths?
Credo AI's published strengths include Purpose-built AI registry and discovery - inventory of AI systems, agents, models and shadow AI, with a dependency graph across agents, models, tools and data and auto-discovery across cloud environments. Acompli keeps an AI-system register but does not do model-level auto-discovery; Continuous, AI-specific risk intelligence - an agentic risk-assessment library, automated red-teaming, drift detection and continuous evaluation of agent traces, well beyond a privacy-ops AI register; Pre-built regulatory policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2, with automated evidence generation and governance AI agents (GAIA) that retrieve evidence, draft governance plans and propose remediation while keeping humans in the loop.
What is Credo AI's pricing or review signal?
Credo AI's pricing or review signal in this profile is: Credo AI (Palo Alto, California; founded 2020 by Navrina Singh) is an enterprise platform purpose-built for AI governance, risk and compliance. Its stated aim is to let enterprises trust their AI and prove it: discover and inventory AI systems, agents and shadow AI; run continuous risk assessment; apply pre-built regulatory policy packs; and generate audit-ready evidence. It maps to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, SOC 2 and US-specific rules (for example Colorado SB21-169 and NYC Local Law 144), and integrates with cloud, MLOps and GRC tooling such as AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks, Snowflake, ServiceNow and OneTrust. Named customers include Mastercard, Autodesk, Booz Allen Hamilton and US federal programmes, and Credo AI was named a Leader in The Forrester Wave AI Governance Solutions, Q3 2025, and recognised in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for AI Governance Platforms. This page was last reviewed on 30 June 2026, and buyers should verify current pricing, ratings, plan limits, implementation fees and service scope directly with Credo AI.
Does Credo AI support GDPR Article 30 RoPA?
Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Credo AI is marked N for RoPA / Article 30 here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Credo AI support DPIA or privacy assessments?
Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Credo AI is marked N for DPIA/PIA assessments here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Credo AI support DSAR or privacy rights workflows?
Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Credo AI is marked N for DSAR / privacy rights here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Credo AI provide data mapping?
Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Credo AI is marked N for Data mapping here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Credo AI provide vendor risk or third-party privacy risk management?
Yes. Credo AI is marked as publicly evidenced for Vendor risk in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
Does Credo AI provide consent management or cookie scanning?
Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Credo AI is marked N for Consent management here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Not clearly in the reviewed source set. Credo AI is marked N for Cookie/tracker scanning here, meaning public evidence was not clear in this review, not proof the supplier cannot provide it. Acompli is marked as not clearly evidenced for consent management and not clearly evidenced for cookie/tracker scanning, so buyers needing either capability should verify live vendor scope before procurement.
Does Credo AI provide AI governance?
Yes. Credo AI is marked as publicly evidenced for AI governance in the reviewed source set. Acompli is marked as publicly evidenced for the same row. Buyers should verify live module scope, service scope and export evidence directly with each supplier before procurement.
How should buyers read the Credo AI vs Acompli capability table?
The table records public evidence found for each supplier. "Y" means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was evidenced in reviewed public sources; "N" means it was not clearly evidenced here, not proof that the supplier cannot provide it.
What are Credo AI alternatives?
Credo AI alternatives depend on the buyer's exact requirement, because Credo AI's strongest fit is: Choose Credo AI when the main problem is governing a large estate of AI models and agents against AI-specific frameworks, with model-level discovery, testing and conformity. The shortlist may include broad privacy platforms, GRC tools, specialist consent or DSAR tools, service providers, and Acompli where the buyer needs overlapping privacy-governance workflows shown in the table.
How does Credo AI compare with Acompli?
Credo AI should be assessed first on its own published fit: Choose Credo AI when the main problem is governing a large estate of AI models and agents against AI-specific frameworks, with model-level discovery, testing and conformity. Acompli is included as a factual overlap point where the requirement is: Choose Acompli when the priority is connected, human-approved, provenance-based EU AI Act compliance - AI-system records, risk classification and conformity - sitting inside a defensible privacy programme (RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, suppliers) for the Irish DPC and UK ICO. Buyers should ask both suppliers to demonstrate the same workflow with current product screens, exports and implementation assumptions.
When should buyers shortlist Credo AI?
Buyers should shortlist Credo AI when the main problem is governing a large estate of AI models and agents against AI-specific frameworks, with model-level discovery, testing and conformity. They should only compare Acompli for the overlapping requirements shown on this page, and they should keep any specialist supplier that covers a requirement neither platform clearly evidences.
How current is this Credo AI profile?
This profile was last reviewed on 30 June 2026. Ratings, pricing, product names, plan limits and service scope can change, so buyers should treat this as a comparison guide and verify current details with Credo AI before procurement.
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Credo AI alternative
Who are Credo AI's competitors?
Credo AI's competitors are other AI-governance platforms - names commonly compared alongside it include Holistic AI, Modulos, Saidot, IBM watsonx.governance, and the AI-governance modules of broader GRC suites such as OneTrust. Acompli is an EU AI Act governance platform too, taking a different approach: its AI-system register, risk classification and conformity workflow are connected to a full GDPR privacy programme (RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors), with human-approved, provenance-based records built for Irish, UK and EU privacy teams. Credo AI is the dedicated large-estate registry; Acompli is the connected, privacy-integrated route to EU AI Act compliance.
Is Acompli a good Credo AI alternative?
Acompli is a genuine EU AI Act governance alternative for privacy-led buyers, though it takes a different approach from Credo AI. If you want EU AI Act governance - AI-system register, risk classification, conformity and assessment - that is human-approved and connected to your Article 30, DPIA and DSAR records, with a per-entity export for the DPC or ICO, Acompli is a strong fit. If you need model-level AI discovery, bias and robustness testing, drift detection, agent governance and framework conformity across a large AI estate, Credo AI is the dedicated large-estate registry for that specialist work and Acompli does not replace it there.
Does Acompli replace Credo AI?
For an enterprise running a large AI/ML estate that needs model-level work, not fully. Credo AI operates at the AI-model and agent level - discovery, bias and robustness testing, continuous evaluation and framework conformity - which Acompli does not do. Where Acompli does deliver EU AI Act governance is the compliance layer: an AI-system register, risk classification and conformity workflow, human-approved and connected to the DPIA and Article 30 records, with a per-entity regulator export. A large ML estate might run Credo AI for model-level governance and Acompli for connected AI Act compliance; a privacy-led team that needs the compliance record, not model testing, can use Acompli on its own.
How do Credo AI and Acompli differ?
Both are EU AI Act governance platforms with different approaches. Credo AI is a dedicated enterprise AI-governance registry: it discovers AI systems and agents, runs continuous risk intelligence, ships pre-built policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2, and uses governance AI agents to draft evidence at large-estate scale. Acompli delivers EU AI Act governance as a core pillar connected to the privacy programme: an AI-system register, risk classification and conformity/assessment workflow tied to assessment-fed RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk and vendor records - each entry human-approved, traceable to its source, and exportable per legal entity for the Irish DPC or UK ICO. Same regulation, different approach: dedicated large-estate registry versus connected, provenance-based, privacy-integrated AI Act compliance.
Does Credo AI do RoPA, DPIA or DSAR like Acompli?
No. Credo AI is an AI-governance platform, not a GDPR privacy-operations tool. Its records are AI-framework-shaped (AI risk classification, model cards, conformity assessments, policy-pack evidence), not GDPR Article 30 records, DPIAs or data-subject-access-request workflows. Acompli is built for exactly those privacy workflows and connects its AI-system register to them, which is why an Irish or UK privacy team that needs AI systems inside its Article 30 and DPIA record would look to Acompli rather than Credo AI.
Does Credo AI publish pricing, and does Acompli?
Credo AI does not publish list pricing; it is demo-led and quoted per organisation, with independent estimates in the region of USD 30,000 to USD 150,000+ per year before implementation. Acompli also prices on scope (legal entities, jurisdictions, users and integrations) and provides pricing on request rather than a public list price, because the effort scales with the programme rather than the number of logins. Neither vendor lists a public price.
What is Credo AI best at?
Credo AI is strongest at model-level AI governance for large enterprises: auto-discovering AI systems, agents and shadow AI; building a dependency graph across models, tools and data; running automated red-teaming, drift detection and continuous evaluation; and applying pre-built policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2 with governance AI agents that draft evidence and remediation. It is a recognised AI-governance leader (Forrester Wave Q3 2025; Gartner Market Guide 2025) with a rating around 4.2 on Gartner Peer Insights.
Does Credo AI cover the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001?
Yes. Credo AI ships pre-built regulatory policy packs and controls mapping for the EU AI Act (including risk classification and conformity assessments), the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001, alongside SOC 2 and US rules such as Colorado SB21-169 and NYC Local Law 144. Acompli also governs the EU AI Act as a core pillar - an AI-system register, EU AI Act risk classification, and a conformity and assessment workflow with human-approved records connected to the DPIA and Article 30 record. Credo AI's added depth is multi-framework conformity tooling (NIST, ISO 42001, US rules) and model-level testing at large-estate scale, which Acompli does not attempt; Acompli's focus is connected, provenance-based EU AI Act compliance for Irish, UK and EU privacy teams.
Can Credo AI govern AI vendors and third-party models?
Yes - Credo AI lists third-party and vendor AI risk assessment among its use cases, letting organisations assess and govern externally sourced AI systems and models within the same registry and policy framework. Acompli also handles vendor risk, but as part of a privacy programme (supplier and processor evidence tied to the Article 30 record), rather than model-level assessment of third-party AI, so the two treat vendor risk from different angles.
Is Credo AI suitable for multi-entity corporate groups?
Credo AI's own self-hosted documentation notes that multiple organisations and business units are not supported on a single instance at this time, so multi-entity separation is a point to confirm directly with the vendor for a corporate group. Acompli models multi-entity structures with a self-contained per-entity export for each supervisory authority, so each subsidiary can answer its own DPC or ICO - a structural difference for groups whose deciding factor is a defensible, per-entity record.
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleDSAR management
Manage requests from intake to archive with deadlines, identity checks, redaction and audit history.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Credo AI and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Credo AI, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.