Who each option is best for, and where either supplier is deliberately narrower.
Competitor profile
Ailance / 2B Advice vs Acompli: product and service comparison
Ailance / 2B Advice is profiled first using its public positioning: No-code, modular integrated-risk platform spanning privacy (RoPA, DPIA), consent, cookie compliance and AI governance, with pay-per-use pricing. The page then maps product and service coverage against Acompli so buyers can see overlap, gaps and specialist strengths.
Which public claims, review signals, caveats and capability rows are evidenced.
How much work it takes to implement, maintain and export the privacy record.
The questions a privacy team should ask before switching or shortlisting.
Key takeaways
- Ailance / 2B Advice public market lane: No-code, modular integrated-risk platform spanning privacy (RoPA, DPIA), consent, cookie compliance and AI governance, with pay-per-use pricing.
- Ailance / 2B Advice best-fit buyer: DACH and international mid-market to enterprise organisations - plus consultancies and associations building licensable solutions - that want a no-code platform they assemble themselves and pay for by usage.
- Ailance / 2B Advice published strengths include consent and cookie compliance via CookieProof - automatic cookie detection, a compliant consent banner and preference management, included in paid Ailance subscriptions. Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- The capability rows use public-documentation signals: "Y" means publicly documented, and "N" means not publicly confirmed.
01Ailance / 2B Advice profile
What Ailance / 2B Advice provides
Ailance is the SaaS platform from 2B Advice GmbH (Bonn, Germany), an international data-protection and compliance firm with roughly 20 years in the market, ISO/IEC 27001 certification, and a long DACH consulting and external-DPO practice; Ailance succeeds its earlier PrIME product line. It positions itself as a no-code, AI-enabled integrated-risk management platform where teams assemble ready-made modules - RoPA/VVT, DPIA/TIA, DPA and vendor management, consent and cookie compliance (CookieProof), IT asset management and AI governance - by drag-and-drop, with several further modules (policy, ISMS, incident and audit management, vendor risk) on the roadmap.
Ailance publishes a pay-per-use credit price list: Starter (EUR 49.90/month, 50 credits, 1 solution), Essential (EUR 199.90/month, 200 credits, 2 solutions), Premium (EUR 599.90/month, 600 credits, 3 solutions) and Professional (EUR 1,490.90/month, 1,500 credits, 5 solutions) on annual billing, with Enterprise and Ultima on custom quotes. Credits are consumed by records such as users, customers, workflows and processing activities, with additional credits billed per unit.
| Signal | Details |
|---|---|
| Market lane | No-code, modular integrated-risk platform spanning privacy (RoPA, DPIA), consent, cookie compliance and AI governance, with pay-per-use pricing. |
| Best-fit buyer | DACH and international mid-market to enterprise organisations - plus consultancies and associations building licensable solutions - that want a no-code platform they assemble themselves and pay for by usage. |
| Ratings / pricing signal | German (Bonn) vendor with ISO/IEC 27001 certification and ~20 years' data-protection heritage. Public pay-per-use pricing from EUR 49.90/month (Starter) to EUR 1,490.90/month (Professional), with Enterprise/Ultima on custom quotes. Review coverage on G2, Capterra, Software Advice and Gartner Peer Insights is currently thin (few or no scored reviews). |
| Deployment / operating model | Cloud SaaS integrated-risk platform (English, German, French, Italian) with a no-code drag-and-drop builder, a shared knowledge base and an AI assistant (ThinkTank); modules are combined and expanded without programming under a pay-per-use credit model. |
02Official website signals
What Ailance / 2B Advice emphasises on its own website
2B Advice positions Ailance as an integrated risk and data privacy management platform.
- Official pages emphasise data protection, compliance, risk management and configurable no-code workflows.
- Public Ailance pages reference RoPA, DPO, DPIA, consent and preferences, third-party risk, GRC and AI-supported compliance work.
- Ailance is best treated as a DACH-rooted integrated-risk and privacy platform, not only as a RoPA register.
- Consent and cookie compliance via CookieProof - automatic cookie detection, a compliant consent banner and preference management, included in paid Ailance subscriptions. Acompli is not a consent-management platform and does not scan cookies or trackers.
- A genuine no-code, drag-and-drop builder (Ailance Core) that lets teams, consultancies and associations assemble and license their own custom compliance solutions on a shared knowledge base without writing code.
- A fully public, transparent pay-per-use credit price list from EUR 49.90/month, so buyers can size cost to usage - Acompli prices on scope and does not list public prices.
- Deep DACH heritage: 2B Advice is a Bonn-based, ISO/IEC 27001-certified firm with ~20 years' experience, an external-DPO consulting practice and multilingual EU coverage (DE/EN/FR/IT).
05At a glance
Ailance / 2B Advice vs Acompli at a glance
This page profiles Ailance / 2B Advice first, then compares public product and service coverage so buyers can decide what fits their own requirement.
| Decision question | Ailance / 2B Advice | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want a modular, no-code integrated-risk platform they assemble themselves, with consent, cookie compliance and pay-per-use pricing. | Privacy teams that need a focused operating layer for connected records, evidence packs, human approval and Ireland/UK/EU workflows. |
| Operating model | A no-code integrated-risk platform where you combine ready-made modules (RoPA, DPIA, consent, cookie, AI governance) by drag-and-drop and pay per use. | Connected GDPR and EU AI Act records - RoPA, DPIA, DSAR, risk, vendors, data mapping and AI governance - where one approved assessment feeds every downstream record. |
| When to choose it | Choose Ailance when a no-code build-your-own platform, consent and cookie compliance, and transparent pay-per-use pricing match the programme you want to run. | Choose Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval. |
06Capability comparison
Ailance / 2B Advice product and service coverage compared with Acompli
Y means a meaningful product, module, feature or service was publicly documented at the time of writing.
| Capability | Ailance / 2B Advice | Acompli |
|---|---|---|
| DPIA/PIA assessments | Y | Y |
| RoPA / Article 30 | Y | Y |
| DSAR / privacy rights | N | N |
| Data mapping | Y | Y |
| Vendor risk | N | Y |
| Privacy risk | Y | Y |
| AI governance | Y | Y |
| Consent management | Y | N |
| Cookie/tracker scanning | Y | N |
| Breach/incident management | N | N |
| Retention management | N | Y |
| Policy/notice management | N | N |
| Training module | N | N |
| Approval workflows | Y | Y |
| Audit trail | Y | Y |
| Role-based access control | Y | Y |
| Multi-entity support | Y | Y |
| Spreadsheet import | N | Y |
| PDF/CSV/Excel export | Y | Y |
| Public pricing | Y | N |
07Ireland & UK
Ailance / 2B Advice vs Acompli for RoPA in Ireland and the UK
Ailance is built for the DACH and wider EU market with German data-protection roots, while Acompli is built around the Irish DPC and UK ICO, so for an Irish or UK team the deciding question is the depth of the Article 30 record. Records of processing are required under GDPR Article 30 - a controller record under Article 30(1) and a processor record under Article 30(2); the Irish DPC and the UK ICO each publish Article 30 documentation guidance.
For both Ailance / 2B Advice and Acompli, buyers should ask to see entity-scoped exports, reviewer history, source evidence and how EU GDPR and UK GDPR records are separated in practice.
- EU GDPR Article 30(1) and Article 30(2) controller and processor records.
- UK GDPR Article 30 documentation and ICO guidance fit.
- Irish DPC accountability expectations and exportable evidence for each legal entity.
08Shortlisting notes
When Ailance / 2B Advice belongs on the shortlist
Ailance / 2B Advice should remain on the shortlist when its published market lane, product strengths and buyer fit match the requirement.
Acompli should be evaluated only where its own workflow coverage matches the requirement; this page is intended to show overlap and gaps, not to force a universal replacement narrative.
- Shortlist Ailance / 2B Advice when a no-code build-your-own platform, consent and cookie compliance, and transparent pay-per-use pricing match the programme you want to run.
- Shortlist Acompli when the main problem is keeping evidence, assessments, RoPA, suppliers and risk decisions connected and defensible after approval.
- Ask each supplier to demonstrate the same workflow using current product screens, exports, review history and implementation assumptions.
Comparison FAQ
Ailance questions answered
Acompli answers
Acompli as a Ailance alternative
Acompli overlap
Related Acompli workflows
Assessments
Run DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with templates, AI support and human approval.
Open moduleRoPA management
Maintain Article 30 records that stay linked to approved assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
Open moduleRisk management
Extract candidate risks from approved evidence, assign treatment plans and report on current exposure.
Open moduleCompare Ailance / 2B Advice and Acompli against a real workflow.
Bring one RoPA, DPIA, vendor, risk or AI-governance requirement and map which parts are covered by Ailance / 2B Advice, which parts Acompli covers, and where another specialist may still be needed.
Acompli architecture
One governed foundation. Five connected modules.
Imported systems, suppliers, policies, DPIAs and RoPA spreadsheets become the shared evidence model for assessments, risk, records, third-party oversight and data mapping.
- OnboardingImport DPIAs, RoPA spreadsheets, suppliers, systems, policies and documents.
- AssessmentsRun DPIAs, LIAs, TIAs, processor reviews and AI Act assessments with human approval.
- RiskExtract candidate risks from approved evidence and assign treatment plans.
- RoPAMaintain Article 30 records linked to assessments, systems, suppliers and transfers.
- Third-PartyRecord suppliers once, then reference them across assessments, RoPA, risk and maps.
- Data MappingBuild a living view of systems, suppliers, locations, categories and transfers.
Point tools create records. Acompli connects them.